Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with adductor canal block
- Authors: Ubaydullaev B.S.1, Khodjanov I.Y.2, Abdullaeva H.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Nano Medical Clinic
- Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Traumatology And Orthopedics
- Section: Original study articles
- Submitted: 02.05.2025
- Accepted: 05.09.2025
- Published: 21.09.2025
- URL: https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/679082
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA679082
- ID: 679082
Cite item
Full Text



Abstract
Introduction. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a BTB autograft is associated with the development of anterior knee pain in the area of the donor site. The Adductor Canal Block provides interruption of afferent pain impulses from the donor site which preserves the possibility of early quadriceps muscle activation. The study aimed to determine the effect of the Adductor Canal Block on the development of anterior knee pain and neuromuscular control recovery in ACL surgery with BTB autograft. Material and methods. 104 patients with isolated ACL tears were operated on in the period from 2022 to 2024 using the BTB autograft. The control group consisted of 52 patients (BTB) who underwent ACL reconstruction under spinal anesthesia. Adductor Canal Block supplemented Spinal anesthesia in 52 patients of the leading group (BTBb). The results are based on the severity of pain syndrome using the VAS scale on days 1 and 2 after surgery and the restoration of knee joint function based on plyometric tests at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Results. On days 1 and 2 after surgery, the intensity of pain syndrome according to the VAS scale in the BTBb group (4.19±0.68 points and 2.56±0.89 points, respectively; p <0.0001) was significantly lower than in the control group (8.23±0.7 and 6.46±0.9 points, respectively; p=0.001). By the end of 6 and 12 weeks, the Single Squat test and Y-balance test values in the BTBb group significantly exceeded similar values in the control group. By the end of week 24, the number of patients who exceeded the 90% threshold in performing a vertical jump on one leg compared to the healthy side was significantly higher in the BTBb group (88.9%) than in the BTB – group (42.3%; p <0.0001). Forward jump on one leg was successfully performed by all patients in the BTBb group (100.0%) and more than half of the BTB group (53.8%; p <0.0001). Lateral jumps on one leg were also performed significantly more often by patients in the BTBb group (70.4%) and less than half of the BTB group (42.3%; p = 0.04). Conclusion. Adductor Canal Block, as an adjunct to spinal anesthesia in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, significantly reduces the intensity of anterior knee pain. At the same time, the preservation of efferent impulses provides the possibility of early activation of the thigh muscles.
Full Text

About the authors
Bobur Sabirovich Ubaydullaev
Nano Medical Clinic
Author for correspondence.
Email: ubobur@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5008-6738
SPIN-code: 4773-0495
orthoipedic surgeon
Uzbekistan, Talabalar atreet, 52, TashkentIskandar Yunusovich Khodjanov
Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Traumatology And Orthopedics
Email: prof.khodjanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9420-3623
Orthopedic surgeon, Doctor of Scince, Professor
Uzbekistan, Tashkent city, Makhtumquli street, 78Hilola Nodirovna Abdullaeva
Nano Medical Clinic
Email: hil-73@mail.ru
anesthesiologist, PhD
Uzbekistan, Talabalar street, 52, TashkentReferences
- Musahl V, Engler ID, Nazzal EM, et al. Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(1): 34-51. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06825-z
- Borque KA, Laughlin MS, Pinheiro VH, et al. Rebranding the 'anatomic' ACL reconstruction: Current concepts. J ISAKOS. 2023; 8(1): 23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.11.001.
- He X, Yang XG, Feng JT, et al. Clinical Outcomes of the Central Third Patellar Tendon Versus Four-strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Injury. 2020; 51(8):1714-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.025.
- Malige A, Baghdadi S, Hast MW, et al. Biomechanical properties of common graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2022; 95: 105636. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105636
- Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020; 36(8):2279-2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024.
- Khodjanov IY, Ubaydullaev BS. A Modified Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With “Bone-Tendon-Bone” Autograft. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2024; 30(2): 143-150. (In Russ). doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905
- Hannon JP, Wang-Price S, Goto S, et al. Twelve-Week Quadriceps Strength as A Predictor of Quadriceps Strength аt Time Of Return To Sport Testing Following Bone- Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. IJSPT. 2021; 16(3): 681-688. doi: 10.26603/001c.23421
- Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Newcombe P, Keays AC. The relationship between knee strength and functional stability before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2003; 21: 231-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0736-0266(02)00160-2
- Frank RM, Higgins J, Bernardoni E, et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Basics: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Harvest. Arthrosc Tech. 2017; 6(4): e1189-e1194. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.04.006
- Bolia IK, Haratian A, Bell JA, et al. Managing Perioperative Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Perspectives from a Sports Medicine Surgeon. Open Access J Sports Med. 2021; 12: 129-138. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S266227
- Hasegawa M, Singh D, Urits I, et al. Review on Nerve Blocks Utilized for Perioperative Total Knee Arthroplasty Analgesia. Orthopedic Reviews. 2022; 14(3): 37405. doi.org/10.52965/001c.37405
- You D, Qin L, Li K, et al. A meta-analysis on advantages of peripheral nerve block post-total knee arthroplasty. Korean J Pain. 2021; 34(3): 271-287. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.271.
- Ivanov MD, Zabolotskiy DV, Kulev AG, et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents. What to choose for anesthesia? Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2014; 20(1): 59-64. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-44.
- Macrinici G, Murphy C, Christman L, et al. Randomized Study to Evaluate Single-Injection Adductor Canal Nerve Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block: Postoperative Functional Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017; 42(1): 10-16. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000507.
- Elkassabany NM, Antosh S, Ahmed M, et al. The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2016; 122(5): 1696-1703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237
- Andrianova TO, Ezhevskaya AA, Sushin VO, Zagrekov VI. The optimal choice of regional anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 2023; 17(3): 185–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA568266
- Manevskiy AA, Sviridov SV, Builova TV, et al. Combination of peripheral blocks as a part of enhanced rehabilitation in total knee replacement: a prospective comparative open randomized study. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2022; 16(3): 205–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA111184
- Sinha C, Singh AK, Kumar A, et al. Analgesic effect of continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block for knee arthroscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022; 72(5): 553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.017
Supplementary files
