Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with adductor canal block



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with a BTB autograft is associated with the development of anterior knee pain in the area of the donor site. The Adductor Canal Block provides interruption of afferent pain impulses from the donor site which preserves the possibility of early quadriceps muscle activation. The study aimed to determine the effect of the Adductor Canal Block on the development of anterior knee pain and neuromuscular control recovery in ACL surgery with BTB autograft. Material and methods. 104 patients with isolated ACL tears were operated on in the period from 2022 to 2024 using the BTB autograft. The control group consisted of 52 patients (BTB) who underwent ACL reconstruction under spinal anesthesia. Adductor Canal Block supplemented Spinal anesthesia in 52 patients of the leading group (BTBb). The results are based on the severity of pain syndrome using the VAS scale on days 1 and 2 after surgery and the restoration of knee joint function based on plyometric tests at 6, 12, and 24 weeks. Results. On days 1 and 2 after surgery, the intensity of pain syndrome according to the VAS scale in the BTBb group (4.19±0.68 points and 2.56±0.89 points, respectively; p <0.0001) was significantly lower than in the control group (8.23±0.7 and 6.46±0.9 points, respectively; p=0.001). By the end of 6 and 12 weeks, the Single Squat test and Y-balance test values in the BTBb group significantly exceeded similar values in the control group. By the end of week 24, the number of patients who exceeded the 90% threshold in performing a vertical jump on one leg compared to the healthy side was significantly higher in the BTBb group (88.9%) than in the BTB – group (42.3%; p <0.0001). Forward jump on one leg was successfully performed by all patients in the BTBb group (100.0%) and more than half of the BTB group (53.8%; p <0.0001). Lateral jumps on one leg were also performed significantly more often by patients in the BTBb group (70.4%) and less than half of the BTB group (42.3%; p = 0.04). Conclusion. Adductor Canal Block, as an adjunct to spinal anesthesia in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, significantly reduces the intensity of anterior knee pain. At the same time, the preservation of efferent impulses provides the possibility of early activation of the thigh muscles.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Bobur Sabirovich Ubaydullaev

Nano Medical Clinic

Author for correspondence.
Email: ubobur@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5008-6738
SPIN-code: 4773-0495

orthoipedic surgeon

Uzbekistan, Talabalar atreet, 52, Tashkent

Iskandar Yunusovich Khodjanov

Republican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center of Traumatology And Orthopedics

Email: prof.khodjanov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9420-3623

Orthopedic surgeon, Doctor of Scince, Professor

Uzbekistan, Tashkent city, Makhtumquli street, 78

Hilola Nodirovna Abdullaeva

Nano Medical Clinic

Email: hil-73@mail.ru

anesthesiologist, PhD

Uzbekistan, Talabalar street, 52, Tashkent

References

  1. Musahl V, Engler ID, Nazzal EM, et al. Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(1): 34-51. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06825-z
  2. Borque KA, Laughlin MS, Pinheiro VH, et al. Rebranding the 'anatomic' ACL reconstruction: Current concepts. J ISAKOS. 2023; 8(1): 23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.11.001.
  3. He X, Yang XG, Feng JT, et al. Clinical Outcomes of the Central Third Patellar Tendon Versus Four-strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Injury. 2020; 51(8):1714-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.025.
  4. Malige A, Baghdadi S, Hast MW, et al. Biomechanical properties of common graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2022; 95: 105636. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105636
  5. Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020; 36(8):2279-2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024.
  6. Khodjanov IY, Ubaydullaev BS. A Modified Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With “Bone-Tendon-Bone” Autograft. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2024; 30(2): 143-150. (In Russ). doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905
  7. Hannon JP, Wang-Price S, Goto S, et al. Twelve-Week Quadriceps Strength as A Predictor of Quadriceps Strength аt Time Of Return To Sport Testing Following Bone- Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. IJSPT. 2021; 16(3): 681-688. doi: 10.26603/001c.23421
  8. Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Newcombe P, Keays AC. The relationship between knee strength and functional stability before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2003; 21: 231-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0736-0266(02)00160-2
  9. Frank RM, Higgins J, Bernardoni E, et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Basics: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Harvest. Arthrosc Tech. 2017; 6(4): e1189-e1194. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.04.006
  10. Bolia IK, Haratian A, Bell JA, et al. Managing Perioperative Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Perspectives from a Sports Medicine Surgeon. Open Access J Sports Med. 2021; 12: 129-138. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S266227
  11. Hasegawa M, Singh D, Urits I, et al. Review on Nerve Blocks Utilized for Perioperative Total Knee Arthroplasty Analgesia. Orthopedic Reviews. 2022; 14(3): 37405. doi.org/10.52965/001c.37405
  12. You D, Qin L, Li K, et al. A meta-analysis on advantages of peripheral nerve block post-total knee arthroplasty. Korean J Pain. 2021; 34(3): 271-287. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.271.
  13. Ivanov MD, Zabolotskiy DV, Kulev AG, et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents. What to choose for anesthesia? Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2014; 20(1): 59-64. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-44.
  14. Macrinici G, Murphy C, Christman L, et al. Randomized Study to Evaluate Single-Injection Adductor Canal Nerve Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block: Postoperative Functional Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017; 42(1): 10-16. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000507.
  15. Elkassabany NM, Antosh S, Ahmed M, et al. The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2016; 122(5): 1696-1703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237
  16. Andrianova TO, Ezhevskaya AA, Sushin VO, Zagrekov VI. The optimal choice of regional anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 2023; 17(3): 185–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA568266
  17. Manevskiy AA, Sviridov SV, Builova TV, et al. Combination of peripheral blocks as a part of enhanced rehabilitation in total knee replacement: a prospective comparative open randomized study. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2022; 16(3): 205–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA111184
  18. Sinha C, Singh AK, Kumar A, et al. Analgesic effect of continuous adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block for knee arthroscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022; 72(5): 553-559. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.017

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ ФС 77 - 55827 от 30.10.2013 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80651 от 15.03.2021 г
.