<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1993-6508</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2687-1394</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">679082</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/RA679082</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">AAUPGR</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original study articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные исследования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The Effect of Adductor Canal Block on Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Влияние блокады приводящего канала на исходы реконструкции передней крестообразной связки</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5008-6738</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4773-0495</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ubaydullaev</surname><given-names>Bobur S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Убайдуллаев</surname><given-names>Бобур Сабирович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="UZ">Uzbekistan</country></address><email>ubobur@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9420-3623</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5038-3859</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Khodjanov</surname><given-names>Iskandar Y.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ходжанов</surname><given-names>Искандар Юнусович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="UZ">Uzbekistan</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, профессор</p></bio><email>prof.khodjanov@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5144-2664</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Abdullaeva</surname><given-names>Hilola N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Абдуллаева</surname><given-names>Хилола Нодировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="UZ">Uzbekistan</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук</p></bio><email>hil-73@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">“Nano Medical Clinic”</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Nano Medical Clinic</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Scientific research institute of traumatology and orthopedics of Republic of Uzbekistan</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Научно-исследовательский институт травматологии и ортопедии Республики Узбекистан</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2025-10-09" publication-format="electronic"><day>09</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-11-06" publication-format="electronic"><day>06</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>211</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-05-02"><day>02</day><month>05</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-09-05"><day>05</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2025, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2025, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/679082">https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/679082</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>BACKGROUND:</bold> Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) autograft is often associated with anterior knee pain at the graft harvest site. It is assumed that an adductor canal block interrupts pain transmission from the graft harvest area, thereby preserving the ability for early quadriceps activation.</p> <p><bold>AIM:</bold> The work aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of adductor canal block as an adjunct to spinal anesthesia during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a BTB autograft.</p> <p><bold>METHODS: </bold>The study included 104 patients with isolated ACL rupture who underwent surgery between 2022 and 2024 using a BTB autograft. The control group consisted of 52 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction under spinal anesthesia alone. In the main group of 52 patients, spinal anesthesia was supplemented with an adductor canal block. Outcomes were assessed based on pain intensity measured using the visual analog scale on postoperative days 1 and 2 and by evaluating knee joint functional recovery using plyometric tests at weeks 6, 12, and 24.</p> <p><bold>RESULTS: </bold>On postoperative days 1 and 2, pain intensity measured by the visual analog scale was significantly lower in the main group (4.19 ± 0.68 and 2.56 ± 0.89 points, respectively; p &lt; 0.0001) than in the control group (8.23 ± 0.7 and 6.46 ± 0.9 points, respectively; p = 0.001). By weeks 6 and 12, the results of the single-leg squat and Y-balance tests were significantly better in the main group than in the control group. At week 24, the proportion of patients whose vertical jump performance on the operated leg reached more than 90٪ of that on the contralateral side was significantly higher in the main group (88.9٪ vs 42.3٪; p &lt; 0.0001). All patients in the main group (100٪) and more than half in the control group (53.8٪; p &lt; 0.0001) successfully performed the single-leg forward jump. Lateral single-leg jumps were also more frequently completed by patients in the main group (70.4٪) than in the control group (42.3٪; p = 0.04).</p> <p><bold>CONCLUSION: </bold>The study reliably confirms the effectiveness of adductor canal block as an additional method of anesthesia during arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a BTB autograft.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование. </bold>Артроскопическая реконструкция передней крестообразной связки с использованием аутотрансплантата связки надколенника — Bone-Tendon-Bone (BTB) — сопряжена с развитием боли в переднем отделе сустава в области забора трансплантата. Предполагается, что блокада приводящего канала обеспечивает прерывание болевой импульсации из зоны забора трансплантата, что, в свою очередь, сохраняет возможность ранней активации четырёхглавой мышцы бедра.</p> <p><bold>Цель —</bold> определение эффективности блокады приводящего канала в качестве дополнения к спинномозговой анестезии при реконструкции передней крестообразной связки аутотрансплантатом BTB.</p> <p><bold>Методы. </bold>В исследование включены 104 пациента с изолированным разрывом передней крестообразной связки, прооперированные в период с 2022 по 2024 гг. с использованием аутотрансплантата BTB. Контрольную группу составили 52 пациента, которым была выполнена пластика передней крестообразной связки под спинномозговой анестезией. У 52 пациентов основной группы спинномозговая анестезия дополнялась блокадой приводящего канала. Оценка результатов проводилась на основании выраженности болевого синдрома по визуально-аналоговой шкале в 1-е и 2-е сутки после операции, а также определения степени восстановления функции коленного сустава на основании плиометрических тестов на 6-й, 12-й и 24-й неделях.</p> <p><bold>Результаты.</bold> В первые и вторые сутки после операции интенсивность болевого синдрома по визуально-аналоговой шкале в основной группе (4,19±0,68 балла и 2,56±0,89 балла соответственно, <italic>p &lt;</italic>0,0001) была достоверно ниже, чем в контрольной (8,23±0,7 балла и 6,46±0,9 балла соответственно, <italic>p=</italic>0,001). К концу 6-й и 12-й недель показатели тестов — приседания на одной ноге и тест Y-баланса — в основной группе достоверно превышали аналогичные показатели в контрольной. К концу 24-й недели число пациентов, результат которых при выполнении вертикального прыжка на оперированной ноге составил более 90% по сравнению со здоровой стороной, было значимо больше в основной группе, чем в контрольной: 88,9% против 42,3%, <italic>p &lt;</italic>0,0001. Прыжок вперёд на одной ноге успешно выполняли все пациенты основной группы (100,0%) и больше половины из контрольной (53,8%; <italic>p &lt;</italic>0,0001). Боковые прыжки на одной ноге чаще успешно выполняли пациенты основной группы (70,4%) и менее половины из контрольной (42,3%; <italic>p=</italic>0,04).</p> <p><bold>Заключение.</bold> Исследование достоверно подтверждает эффективность блокады приводящего канала в качестве дополнительного метода анестезии при артроскопической реконструкции передней крестообразной связки аутотрансплантатом BTB.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>arthroscopy</kwd><kwd>anterior cruciate ligament</kwd><kwd>nerve block</kwd><kwd>patellar ligament</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>артроскопия</kwd><kwd>передняя крестообразная связка</kwd><kwd>проводниковая блокада</kwd><kwd>связка надколенника</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Musahl V, Engler ID, Nazzal EM, et al. Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2022;30(1):34–51. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06825-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Borque KA, Laughlin MS, Pinheiro VH, et al. Rebranding the ‘anatomic’ ACL reconstruction: Current concepts. J ISAKOS. 2023;8(1):23–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.11.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>He X, Yang XG, Feng JT, et al. Clinical Outcomes of the Central Third Patellar Tendon Versus Four-strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Injury. 2020;51(8):1714–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.025</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Malige A, Baghdadi S, Hast MW, et al. Biomechanical properties of common graft choices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review. Clin Biomech. 2022;95:105636. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105636</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chen H, Liu H, Chen L. Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Mid- to Long-Term Follow-Up. Arthroscopy. 2020;36(8):2279–2291.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.04.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Khodjanov IY, Ubaydullaev BS. A modified anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with BTB autograft. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2024;30(2):143–150. doi: 10.17816/2311-2905-17503 EDN: VAGAPD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Hannon JP, Wang-Price S, Goto S, et al. Twelve-Week Quadriceps Strength as A Predictor of Quadriceps Strength аt Time Of Return To Sport Testing Following Bone- Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. IJSPT. 2021;16(3):681–688. doi: 10.26603/001c.23421</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Keays SL, Bullock-Saxton JE, Newcombe P, Keays AC. The relationship between knee strength and functional stability before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Res. 2003;21:231–237. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00160-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Frank RM, Higgins J, Bernardoni E, et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Basics: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Harvest. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6(4):e1189–e1194. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.04.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Bolia IK, Haratian A, Bell JA, et al. Managing Perioperative Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction: Perspectives from a Sports Medicine Surgeon. Open Access J Sports Med. 2021;12:129–138. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S266227</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Hasegawa M, Singh D, Urits I, et al. Review on Nerve Blocks Utilized for Perioperative Total Knee Arthroplasty Analgesia. Orthopedic Reviews. 2022;14(3):37405. doi: 10.52965/001c.37405</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Morunova AYu, Yezhevskaya AA, Zagrekov VI, et al. The effect of dexamethasone on the analgesic efficacy of ESP block in spinal surgery. Modern problems of science and education. 2023;(5):23. doi: 10.17513/spno.32975 EDN: VRALSV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>You D, Qin L, Li K, et al. A meta-analysis on advantages of peripheral nerve block post-total knee arthroplasty. Korean J Pain. 2021;34(3):271–287. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.271</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Ivanov MD, Zabolotskiy DV, Kulev AG, et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescents. What to choose for anesthesia? Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2014;20(1):59–64. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-44 EDN: SANLWF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Macrinici G, Murphy C, Christman L, et al. Randomized Study to Evaluate Single-Injection Adductor Canal Nerve Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block: Postoperative Functional Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42(1):10–16. doi: 10.1097/AAP.000000000000050716</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Elkassabany NM, Antosh S, Ahmed M, et al. The Risk of Falls After Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Use of a Femoral Nerve Block Versus an Adductor Canal Block: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(5):1696–1703. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001237</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Andrianova TO, Ezhevskaya AA, Sushin VO, Zagrekov VI. The optimal choice of regional anesthesia in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2023;17(3):185–197. doi: 10.17816/RA568266 EDN: OCDMPY</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Manevskiy AA, Sviridov SV, Builova TV, et al. Combination of peripheral blocks as a part of enhanced rehabilitation in total knee replacement: a prospective comparative open randomized study. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2022;16(3):205–217. doi: 10.17816/RA111184 EDN: KKSYRQ</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
