Clinically Evaluate The Analgesic Efficacy Of Intrathecal Administered Morphine In Thoracic Surgeries
- Authors: Zhikharev V.A.1,2, Bushuev A.S.1, Zimina L.A.1, Arutyunyan R.A.1,2, . Koriachkin V.3
-
Affiliations:
- Scientific Research Institution – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
- Kuban State Medical University
- Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg
- Section: Original study articles
- Submitted: 27.05.2025
- Accepted: 21.09.2025
- Published: 24.09.2025
- URL: https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/680797
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA680797
- ID: 680797
Cite item
Abstract
Background. The intensity of pain in thoracic surgery, associated with nociceptive stimulation caused by skin incision, muscle trauma, rib retraction and pleural dissection, contributes to central sensitization and the formation of severe pain, especially in the early postoperative period. Intrathecal morphine is an alternative opioid-sparing method within the concept of a multimodal approach to the treatment of acute pain.
Objective this study was to clinically evaluate the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal administered morphine in thoracic surgeries.
Methods. 255 patients who underwent lobectomies using thoracoscopic access were examined. The patients were divided into three groups: in the 1st group (n=85) — intrathecal administration of morphine was used, in the 2nd group (n=85) — opioid analgesics, in the 3rd group (n=85) — intercostal blockade with ropivacaine. We assessed the intensity of pain 2 hours and 24 hours after surgery, the need for promedol and tramadol, the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, skin itching, urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization, and delayed respiratory depression.
Results. The level of pain 2 hours after surgery was the lowest in the intercostal blockade group 4[3-4] points, slightly higher in the intrathecal morphine group 4[4-5] points, which were significantly superior in their analgesic effectiveness to the systemic opioid analgesia group — 6 [5-6] points, (p <0.001). 24 hours after surgery, the level of pain in group 1 decreased to 3[2-3] points; in group 2, pain increased to 6[5-6] points, reaching the pain syndrome of patients in group 3 6 [5-6] points (p <0.001). The consumption of promedol was significantly less in group 1 (p <0.001). In relation to tramadol, there was a reduction in the need for administration of the drug, as well as the frequency of its use (p <0.001). The highest risk of developing postoperative nausea and vomiting was in group 2 (p <0.001). Skin itching and urinary retention in absolute numbers were more common in group 1; there were no significant differences according to the χ2 criterion. In no case was delayed respiratory depression observed.
Conclusion. Intrathecal administration of morphine significantly reduced the severity of pain syndrome, significantly reduced the opiate consumption and was accompanied by a low incidence of skin itching on the first day after surgery. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was lower compared with the use of opioids and intercostal nerve blockade. The need for bladder catheterization did not differ between groups. Delayed respiratory depression was not observed in any case.
Full Text

About the authors
Vasily A. Zhikharev
Scientific Research Institution – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1; Kuban State Medical University
Email: Vasilii290873@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5147-5637
SPIN-code: 7406-7687
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), anesthesiologist
Russian Federation, Krasnodar; KrasnodarAlexander S. Bushuev
Scientific Research Institution – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Email: ksmukubris@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1427-4032
SPIN-code: 3640-7080
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), anesthesiologist-resuscitator
Russian Federation, KrasnodarLyudmila A. Zimina
Scientific Research Institution – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1
Email: bolotina.lyuda@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-1819-5913
SPIN-code: 6143-2170
MD, anesthesiologist-resuscitator
Russian Federation, KrasnodarRobert A. Arutyunyan
Scientific Research Institution – Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1; Kuban State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: robert.arutyunyan1212@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-8369-8171
SPIN-code: 6397-0207
clinical resident
Russian Federation, Krasnodar; KrasnodarViktor . Koriachkin
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint Petersburg
Email: vakoryachkin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3400-8989
SPIN-code: 6101-0578
MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Emergency Pediatrics n.a. prof. V.I. Gordeeva
Russian FederationReferences
- Dinges HC, Otto S, Stay DK, et al. Side Effect Rates of Opioids in Equianalgesic Doses via Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(4):1153–1162. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003887
- Lavand'homme P, Steyaert A. Opioid-free anesthesia opioid side effects: tolerance and hyperalgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017;(31):487–498. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.05.003
- Bazarov DV, Toneev EA, Vyzhigina MA, et al. Multidisciplinary approach in management of postoperative pain in modern thoracic surgery. Russian Journal of Pain. 2019;17(2):14–19. doi: 10.25731/RASP.2019.02.15 EDN: CILGBD
- Yaksi O, Ozel A, Yaksi E, Kilicgun A. Postoperative complications and its relationship with the severity of postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Experimental Biomedical Research. 2021;4(2):107–112. doi: 10.30714/j-ebr.2021267973 EDN: EUVFWI
- Joshi GP. Rational Multimodal Analgesia for Perioperative Pain Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023;27(8):227–237. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01137-y EDN: RHEHSM
- Ovechkin AM, Yavorovskii AG. Non-opioid analgesia in surgery: from theory to practice. A guide for physicians. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2024. EDN: GCVKLO
- Kurzova A, Malek J, Klezl P, Hess L, Sliva JA. Single Dose of Intrathecal Morphine Without Local Anesthetic Provides Long-Lasting Postoperative Analgesia After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy. J Perianesth Nurs. 2024;39(4):577–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2023.10.019 EDN: OGAXYS
- Ashoor TM, Esmat IM, Algendy MA, et al. Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2025;39(2):299–310. doi: 10.1007/s00540-025-03466
- .Pierson D, Certoma R, Hobbs J, Cong X, Li J. A Narrative Review on Multimodal Spinal Anesthesia: Old Technique and New Use. J Anesth Transl Med. 2025;4(1):25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jatmed.2025.02.002
- Huang YX, Chen Y, Wang W, et al. Intrathecal hydromorphone vs. transversus abdominis plane block for upper abdominal surgery: a propensity score-matching study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025;25(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03107-w
- Kaye AD, Lindberg AM, Shah SS, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Delivery: A Narrative Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024;28(10):1007–1013. doi: 10.1007/s11916-024-01292-w EDN: ZSZTDZ
- Xue FS, He N, Cheng Y. Comparing analgesic efficacy of different-dose intrathecal morphine after cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024;43(4):101400. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101400 EDN: NESJSP
- Sharpe EE, Molitor RJ, Arendt KW, Torbenson VE, et al. Intrathecal Morphine versus Intrathecal Hydromorphone for Analgesia after Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6):1382–1391. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003283 EDN: AWMPBE
- Potаpov AL, Zemskovа DV, Kostyuk IP. Spinal anesthesia as a part of anaesthesiologic support in fast track laparoscopic colon surgeries. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2018;15(2):21–24. doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-2-21-24 EDN: UOFYQU
- Sokolov SV, Glushchenko VA, Mikhnin AE. Frequency of typical complications of morphine during its intrathecal and epidural introduction in knee arthroplasty. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2023;20(1):36–40. doi: 10.24884/2078-5658-2023-20-1-36-40 EDN: SJNCKF
- Shifman EM, Filippovich GV. Selected chapters from monograph "Spinal anesthesia in obstetrics" respiratory disorders during spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 2013;7(4):44–53. EDN: RRSEZX
- Rawal N. Intrathecal opioids for the management of post-operative pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023;37(2):123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.01.001 EDN: AJWUPD
- Pirie KP, Wang A, Yu J, et al. Postoperative analgesia for upper gastrointestinal surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Perioper Med (Lond). 2023;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00324-0 EDN: BRFNAE
- Osipenko DV, Silanau AA, Marochkov AV, Rimashevsky VV. Comparative evaluation of intrathecal morphine on postoperative course in patients undergone cardiac surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2025;19(1):49–58. doi: 10.17816/RA642386 EDN: NSWLUE
- Ezhevskaya AA. Regional anesthesia in spine and spinal cord surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2016;10(1):19–29. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2016-10-1-19-29 EDN: VOHBKB
- Timerbaev VH, Genov PG, Smirnova OV. Intrathecal opioid analgesia — state in the world and in the Russian Federation. Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya . 2015;60(3):70–75.
- Cummings A, Orgill BD, Fitzgerald BM. Intrathecal Morphine. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
- Hermanns H, Bos EME, van Zuylen ML, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF. The options for neuraxial drug administration. Review article. CNS Drugs. 2022;36(8):877–896. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00936-y
- DeSousa KA, Chandran R. Intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia: Current trends. World J Anesthesiol. 2014;3(3):191–202. doi: 10.5313/wja.v3.i3.191
- Gehling M, Tryba M. Risks and side effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:643–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05817.x
- González-Santos S, Mugabure B, Granell M, et al. Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Intrathecal Morphine or Intercostal Levobupivacaine in Lung Cancer Patients after Major Lung Resection Surgery by Videothoracoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13(7):1972. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071972 EDN: MUNAPP
- Sokolov SV, Zabolotskii DV, Koryachkin VA. Prevention of postoperative delirium in patients of elderly and senile age in orthopedic practice. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2018;12(1):41–46. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2018-12-1-41-46 EDN: YVOZGY
- Sommer B, Karageorgos N, AlSharif M, Stubbe H, Hans FJ. Long-term Outcome and Adverse Events of Intrathecal Opioid Therapy for Nonmalignant Pain Syndrome. Pain Pract. 2020;20(1):8–15. doi: 10.1111/papr.12818
- Dhawan R, Daubenspeck D, Wroblewski KE, et al. Intrathecal morphine for analgesia in minimally invasive cardiac surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(5):864–876 doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003963 EDN: GONBVY
- El-Boghdadly K, Renard Y, Rossel JB, et al. Pulmonary complications after intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression and trial sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2025;80(8):959–972. doi: 10.1111/anae.16606
- Renard Y, El-Boghdadly K, Rossel JB, et al. Non-pulmonary complications of intrathecal morphine administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression. Br J Anaesth. 2024;133(4):823–838. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.045
- Frauenknecht J, Kirkham KR, Jacot-Guillarmod A, Albrecht E. Analgesic impact of intra-operative opioids vs. opioid-free anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(5):651–662. doi: 10.1111/anae.14582
Supplementary files
