A Case Report of Erector Spinae Plane Block Application During Abdominal Surgery in an Infant With Coagulation Disorder

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This article presents a clinical case of combined anesthesia during abdominal surgery in which the analgesic component was provided by a bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block using 0.2% ropivacaine in a 2-month-old infant with a coagulation disorder. Selecting an optimal method of analgesia in pediatric patients requiring surgical intervention remains one of the most challenging issues in medicine. The use of regional analgesia as part of multimodal anesthesia is a safe and effective approach to perioperative pain management in neonates and infants. Epidural anesthesia is widely used and classified as a neuraxial block; however, despite its advantages, it has some contraindications and may be associated with rare but significant complications. Therefore, peripheral nerve blocks are increasingly used as an alternative.

CASE DESCRIPTION: This article demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the ESP block as an alternative to epidural anesthesia in an infant admitted from a regional hospital at the age of 2 months and 3 days, presenting with hepatic failure and impaired hemostasis confirmed by laboratory blood tests. Immediately after birth, the patient required respiratory support for 29 days. The infant was admitted for further evaluation, diagnostic clarification, and treatment. After a series of additional examinations, a decision was made to perform surgery, including liver biopsy and cholecystocholangiography. Coagulation abnormalities in the blood test contraindicated epidural anesthesia. Consequently, to reduce the risks of ventilatory support and facilitate early enteral nutrition in the postoperative period, an ESP block was chosen as the method of regional anesthesia. The ESP block is a peripheral nerve block performed under ultrasound guidance, for which hemostatic disorders are not an absolute contraindication. Thus, effective multimodal postoperative analgesia was achieved without opioids; mechanical ventilation was not required, and early enteral feeding was successfully initiated.

CONCLUSION: This clinical case demonstrates the feasibility of using the ESP block as an alternative to epidural anesthesia as part of combined anesthesia in infants undergoing abdominal surgery. The use of peripheral nerve blocks is not limited by hypocoagulation. Given its technical simplicity and the use of ultrasound guidance, the risk of bleeding associated with the ESP block is minimal. This method may serve as a reliable component of multimodal anesthesia in children, including those in the neonatal period.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Olga A. Murashova

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: murashowa.olya2013@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4394-818X
SPIN-code: 2306-6930

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Nazar M. Zelenin

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: piorun1944@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-7357-2223
SPIN-code: 1101-2442

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Gleb E. Ulrikh

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: ostrovgl@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7491-4153
SPIN-code: 7333-9506

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vladislav S. Dvoretskiy

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: butler4@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1008-3626
SPIN-code: 4205-6067

MD

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Zhirkova YV, Kucherov YI, Stepanenko SM. Pain in neonates: prevalence, diagnostics, prevention and treatment. Pediatric pharmacology. 2012;9(4):37–41. EDN: PBXYJH
  2. Matinian NV, Saltanov AI. General anesthesia in combination with neuraxial blockade in pediatric oncologic surgery. Regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 2009;3(3):13–20. EDN: TEKTED
  3. Sichkar SYu, Afukov II. Epidural anesthesia in newborns and infnats with surgical diseases. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2015;5(2):47–51. doi: 10.17816/psaic157
  4. Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, et al. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621–627. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451
  5. Chin KJ, Adhikary S, Sarwani N, Forero M. The analgesic efficacy of pre-operative bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in patients having ventral hernia repair. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(4):452–460. doi: 10.1111/anae.13814
  6. Yildiz M, Kozanhan B, Iyisoy MS, et al. The effect of erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and respiratory function in patients under-going laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Anesth. 2021;74:110403. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021
  7. Athar M, Parveen S, Yadav M, et al. A Randomized double-blind controlled trial to assess the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2021;35(12):3574–3580. doi: 10.1053/J.JVCA.2021.03.009 EDN: IBVEQH
  8. Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, et al. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block forperioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2018;21(3):323–327. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_16_18
  9. Noss C, Anderson KJ, Gregory AJ. Erector spinae plane block for open-heart surgery: a potential tool for improved analgesia. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2019;33(2):376–377. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.07.015
  10. Borys M, Gawęda B, Horeczy B, et al. Erector spinae-plane block as an analgesic alternative in patients undergoing mitral and/or tricuspid valve repair through a right mini-thoracotomy — an observational cohort study. Wideochirurgiaiinne Tech maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery other miniinvasive Tech. 2020;15(1):208–214. doi: 10.5114/WIITM.2019.85396
  11. Stukalov AV, Lakhin RE, Garbuzov EYu, Ershov EN, Stukalov NV. Comparison of the eficiency of prolonged ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and prolonged epidural anesthesia in minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery. Messenger of anesthesiology and resuscitation. 2023;20(2):17–28. doi: 10.24884/2078-5658-2022-20-2-17-28 EDN: BWXOMN
  12. Lakhin RE, Shapovalov PA, Shchegolev AV, et al. Effectiveness of erector spinae plane blockade in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2022;(6):29–43. doi: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202206129 EDN: TXWIFZ
  13. Chin KJ, El-Boghdadly K. Mechanisms of action of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68(3):387–408. doi: 10.1007/s12630-020-01875-2
  14. Adler AC, Yim MM, Chandrakantan A. Erector spinae plane catheter for neonatal thoracotomy: a potentially safer alternative to a thoracic epidural. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(5):607–608. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01296-w
  15. Novikova VS, Kuleshov OV, Ulrikh GE. Regional anesthesia for hip surgery in children: A review. Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive Care. 2023;13(4):537–550. doi: 10.17816/psaic1548 EDN: WQCRHV
  16. Ecoffey C, Lacroix F, Giaufré E, et al. Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists (ADARPEF). Pediatr Anesth. 2010;20(12):1061–1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03448.x
  17. Wong GK, Arab AA, Chew SC, Naser B, Crawford MW. Major complications related to epidural analgesia in children: a 15-year audit of 3,152 epidurals. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60(4):355–63. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9877-3 EDN: VQYCTY
  18. Swenson Schalkwyk A, Flaherty J, Hess D, Horvath B. Erector spinae catheter for post-thoracotomy pain control in a premature neonate. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(9):e234480. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-234480 EDN: WNXLEE

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Ultrasound picture of the positioning of the needle for the injection of local anesthetic during the ESP block (N — needle, T — transverse process, P — pleura pulmonalis).

Download (216KB)

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ ФС 77 - 55827 от 30.10.2013 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80651 от 15.03.2021 г
.