Labor pain relief: a narrative review of the current state of the issue
- Authors: Shnyakin N.S.1, Aksenenko D.V.2, Klimik M.S.2, Ivannikova Y.S.2, Mammaeva P.M.2, Mukha K.K.2, Maaeva K.A.2, Roshchina U.A.2, Lepshokova S.R.2, Kachalkina S.A.2, Kharlamova L.R.2, Udod V.A.2, Pustovetov V.M.2, Buyavchikova D.A.2
-
Affiliations:
- Orenburg State Medical University
- Stavropol State Medical University
- Issue: Vol 19, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 5-17
- Section: Reviews
- Submitted: 14.11.2024
- Accepted: 09.03.2025
- Published: 22.05.2025
- URL: https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/641909
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RA641909
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZYIMTA
- ID: 641909
Cite item
Abstract
Labor is inherently associated with pain. Pain during childbirth arises from both psychological and physiological processes, including myometrial ischemia and tissue stretching. It is considered one of the most painful physiological events experienced by women and has a direct impact on postpartum quality of life. Although pharmacologic pain relief is widely used in current clinical practice, it is often associated with adverse effects and financial costs. These factors, together with patients’ individual and cultural preferences, may encourage the choice of non-pharmacologic methods. This review summarizes fundamental information and presents recent research findings regarding the advantages and disadvantages of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic methods of labor pain relief. Non-pharmacologic methods activate the body’s endogenous analgesic mechanisms, promote relaxation, reduce anxiety, and enhance birth satisfaction. Their low cost, minimal invasiveness, and absence of significant adverse effects make them an attractive option for many women. These methods can reduce pain intensity and should be integrated into practice when patients prefer to avoid neuraxial analgesia or pharmacologic interventions to ensure a more comfortable labor process. However, limited analgesic efficacy, low prevalence of use, and insufficient knowledge and skills remain barriers to their implementation. Pharmacologic methods of pain relief may be used in patients for whom neuraxial analgesia is contraindicated; however, they are often associated with decreased satisfaction with childbirth, as well as a number of adverse effects (including labor dysfunction, hypotension, elevated body temperature, nausea and vomiting, and prolonged duration of labor) affecting both the mother and the newborn. The choice of analgesic method should be individualized, taking into account maternal preferences, obstetric context, the presence of comorbidities, and their potential impact on labor progression.
Full Text

About the authors
Nikita S. Shnyakin
Orenburg State Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: snhfromdol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2496-7438
SPIN-code: 1167-2539
student
Russian Federation, OrenburgDenis V. Aksenenko
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: Dr.aksenenko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2820-3160
SPIN-code: 3948-2147
MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, StavropolMaria S. Klimik
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: Mariaklimik1311@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-6439-0022
student
Russian Federation, StavropolYana S. Ivannikova
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: Yana_iv_banana@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-3839-2263
student
Russian Federation, StavropolPatima M. Mammaeva
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: patimamammaeva4@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-8699-1161
student
Russian Federation, StavropolKristina K. Mukha
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: kristinapups2020@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-5575-0572
student
Russian Federation, StavropolKhadizhat A. Maaeva
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: maaevakhadizhat@icloud.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-8476-4399
student
Russian Federation, StavropolUlyana A. Roshchina
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: vlasovaulya@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-8553-8058
student
Russian Federation, StavropolSofia R. Lepshokova
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: lepshokovasofka@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-7269-699X
student
Russian Federation, StavropolSofia A. Kachalkina
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: kachalkinasofia@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-8078-0843
student
Russian Federation, StavropolLada R. Kharlamova
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: Lada_kharlamova@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2078-1180
student
Russian Federation, StavropolVictoria A. Udod
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: vikulya-udod@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7070-9528
student
Russian Federation, StavropolVictor M. Pustovetov
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: pustov5555_m@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-3577-3224
student
Russian Federation, StavropolDarya A. Buyavchikova
Stavropol State Medical University
Email: dbuyavchikova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-7666-5423
student
Russian Federation, StavropolReferences
- Upriamova EIu, Krasnopol’skiĭ VI, Shifman EM. Pathophysiological bases of pain syndrome during labor. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2017;17(5):13–17. doi: 10.17116/rosakush201717513-17
- Kearns RJ, Kyzayeva A, Halliday LOE, et al. Epidural analgesia during labour and severe maternal morbidity: population based study. BMJ. 2024;385:e077190. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077190
- Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(5):16–24. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121427
- Smith A, Laflamme E, Komanecky C. Pain Management in Labor. Am Fam Physician. 2021;103(6):355–364.
- Smith LA, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6(6):CD007396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub3
- Cornet MC, Kuzniewicz MW, Scheffler AW, et al. Epidural Analgesia During Labor and Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(9):e2433730. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33730
- Kossova AA, Aksenov AN, Bocharova II, Yakubina AA, Upryamova EYu. Some aspects of labor anesthesia from the position of a neonatologist. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-i. 2024;24(5):34–41. doi: 10.17116/rosakush20242405134
- Halliday L, Nelson SM, Kearns RJ. Epidural analgesia in labor: A narrative review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(2):356–364. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14175
- Mwakawanga DL, Sirili N, Chikwala VZ, Mselle LT. “…We never considered it important…”: a qualitative study on perceived barriers on use of non-pharmacological methods in management of labour pain by nurse-midwives in eastern Tanzania. BMC Nurs. 2024;23(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02187-2
- Sharpe EE, Rollins MD. Beyond the epidural: Alternatives to neuraxial labor analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.04.005
- Boselli E, Hopkins P, Lamperti M, et al. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): Peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021;38(3):219–250. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001383
- Baljon K, Romli MH, Ismail AH, et al. Effectiveness of Breathing Exercises, Foot Reflexology and Massage (BRM) on Maternal and Newborn Outcomes Among Primigravidae in Saudi Arabia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Womens Health. 2022;14:279–295. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S347971
- Souto SPAD, Silva RCGD, Prata AP, et al. Midwives’ interventions for reducing fear of childbirth in pregnant women: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 2022;20(12):2867–2935. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00382
- Kaple GS, Patil S. Effectiveness of Jacobson Relaxation and Lamaze Breathing Techniques in the Management of Pain and Stress During Labor: An Experimental Study. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e33212. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33212
- Heim MA, Makuch MY. Breathing Techniques During Labor: A Multinational Narrative Review of Efficacy. J Perinat Educ. 2023;32(1):23–34. doi: 10.1891/JPE-2021-0029
- Akca A, Corbacioglu Esmer A, et al. The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:1127–1133. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4345-5
- Pietrzak J, Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska W, Wróbel A, Grzybowska ME. Women’s Knowledge about Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Methods of Pain Relief in Labor. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(13):1882. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131882
- Robinson CL, Berger A, Sottosanti E, et al. Acupuncture as Part of Multimodal Analgesia for Chronic Pain. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022;14(3):38321. doi: 10.52965/001c.38321
- Gönenç IM, Terzioğlu F. Effects of Massage and Acupressure on Relieving Labor Pain, Reducing Labor Time, and Increasing Delivery Satisfaction. J Nurs Res. 2020;28(1):e68. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000344
- Türkmen H, Çetinkaya S, Kiliç H, et al. The Effect of Ice Massage Applied to the SP6 Point on Labor Pain, Labor Comfort, Labor Duration, and Anxiety: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2024;69(4):491–498. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13600
- Nesheim BI, Kinge R, Berg B, et al. Acupuncture during labor can reduce the use of meperidine: a controlled clinical study. Clin J Pain. 2003;19(3):187–191. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200305000-00006
- Skilnand E, Fossen D, Heiberg E. Acupuncture in the management of pain in labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81(10):943–948. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.811008.x
- Zamora-Brito M, Fernández-Jané C, Pérez-Guervós R, et al. The role of acupuncture in the present approach to labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024;6(2):101272. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101272
- Smith CA, Collins CT, Levett KM, et al. Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2(2):CD009232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2
- Lai CY, Wong MKW, Tong WH, et al. Effectiveness of a childbirth massage programme for labour pain relief in nulliparous pregnant women at term: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Med J. 2021;27(6):405–412. doi: 10.12809/hkmj208629
- ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766 Summary: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):406–408. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003081
- Savona-Ventura C, Mahmood T. The role of traditional complementary physical interventions in obstetrics — A scientific review commissioned by the European board and college of obstetrics and gynaecology (EBCOG). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;279:84–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.10.009
- WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513809/
- Liao CC, Lan SH, Yen YY, et al. Aromatherapy intervention on anxiety and pain during first stage labour in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(1):21–31. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1673707
- Tanvisut R, Traisrisilp K, Tongsong T. Efficacy of aromatherapy for reducing pain during labor: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(5):1145–1150. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4700-1
- Tabatabaeichehr M, Mortazavi H. The Effectiveness of Aromatherapy in the Management of Labor Pain and Anxiety: A Systematic Review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(3):449–458. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v30i3.16
- McKinney JA, Vilchez G, Jowers A, et al. Water birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230(3S):S961–S979.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.08.034
- Liao CC, Lan SH, Yen YY, et al. Aromatherapy intervention on anxiety and pain during first stage labour in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(1):21–31. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1673707
- Burns E, Feeley C, Hall PJ, Vanderlaan J. Systematic review and meta-analysis to examine intrapartum interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes following immersion in water during labour and waterbirth. BMJ Open. 2022;12(7):e056517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056517
- Neiman E, Austin E, Tan A, et al. Outcomes of Waterbirth in a US Hospital-Based Midwifery Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Water Immersion During Labor and Birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(2):2162–2123. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13033
- Bailey JM, Zielinski RE, Emeis CL, Kane Low L. A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings. Birth. 2020;47(1):98–104. doi: 10.1111/birt.12473
- Adamyan LV, Artymuk NV, Belokrinitskaia TE, et al. Neuroxial methods of labor analgesia. Clinical guidelines. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2018;(5):99–110. doi: 10.17116/anaesthesiology201805199
- Pismensky SV, Zolotareva LS, Baev OR, et al. Current state of the problem of pain relief in childbirth. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023;2:26–31. doi: 10.18565/aig.2022.273
- Likis FE, Andrews JC, Collins MR, et al. Nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(1):153–167. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a7f73c
- Sharpe EE, Rollins MD. Beyond the epidural: Alternatives to neuraxial labor analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.04.005
- Seglenieks R, Wong A, Pearson F, McGain F. Discrepancy between procurement and clinical use of nitrous oxide: waste not, want not. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(1):e32–e34. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.10.021
- Sharpe EE, Warner LL, Brakke BD, et al. Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks. J Clin Anesth. 2024;98:111579. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111579
- Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, et al. Meperidine Compared With Nitrous Oxide for Intrapartum Pain Relief in Multiparous Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2023;141(1):4–10. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005011
- Nanji JA, Carvalho B. Pain management during labor and vaginal birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;67:100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.03.002
- Аrbuck DM, Аbuzarova GR, Аlekseeva GS. Opioids in pain syndrome management (part 2). Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2017;14(4):61–71. doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2017-14-4-61-71
- Vvedenskaya ES, Pevnev AA, Molkov AM. Serotonin syndrome: focus on opioid analgesics. Russian Journal of Pain. 2024;22(3):98–106. doi: 10.17116/pain20242203198
- Zuarez-Easton S, Erez O, Zafran N, et al. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options for pain relief during labor: an expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1246–S1259. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.03.003
- Alsmadi MM, Idkaidek N. The Analysis of Pethidine Pharmacokinetics in Newborn Saliva, Plasma, and Brain Extracellular Fluid After Prenatal Intrauterine Exposure from Pregnant Mothers Receiving Intramuscular Dose Using PBPK Modeling. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2023;48(3):281–300. doi: 10.1007/s13318-023-00823-x
- Moe-Byrne T, Brown JVE, McGuire W. Naloxone for opioid-exposed newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10(10):CD003483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003483.pub3
- Show KL, Ngamjarus C, Kongwattanakul K, et al. Fentanyl for labour pain management: a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05169-x
- Wydall S, Zolger D, Owolabi A, et al. Comparison of different delivery modalities of epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in labour: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Comparaison des différentes modalités d’administration de l’analgésie péridurale et de l’analgésie intraveineuse pendant le travail obstétrical revue systématique et méta-analyse en réseau. Can J Anaesth. 2023;70(3):406–442. doi: 10.1007/s12630-022-02389-9
- Douma MR, Verwey RA, Kam-Endtz CE, et al. Obstetric analgesia: a comparison of patient-controlled meperidine, remifentanil, and fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(2):209–215. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep359
- Stourac P, Kosinova M, Harazim H, et al. The analgesic efficacy of remifentanil for labour. Systematic review of the recent literature. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2016;160(1):30–38. doi: 10.5507/bp.2015.043
- Volikas I, Male D. A comparison of pethidine and remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2001;10(2):86–90. doi: 10.1054/ijoa.2000.0831
- Lei X, Yu Y, Li M, et al. The efficacy and safety of remifentanil patient-controlled versus epidural analgesia in labor: A meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0275716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275716
- Van de Velde M, Carvalho B. Remifentanil for labor analgesia: an evidence-based narrative review. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016;25:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.12.004
- Cai M, Liu J, Lei XF, et al. Remifentanil at a Relatively Elevated Dose in Active Phase is Safe and More Suitable Than Fixed Lower Dose for Intravenous Labor Analgesia. J Pain Res. 2023;16:2543–2552. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S419076
- Karol D, Weiniger CF. Update on Non-neuraxial Labor Analgesia. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2021;11(3):348–354. doi: 10.1007/s40140-021-00463-4
- Melber AA, Jelting Y, Huber M, et al. Remifentanil patient-controlled analgesia in labour: six-year audit of outcome data of the RemiPCA SAFE Network (2010–2015). Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;39:12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.004
- Huang CY, Li SX, Yang MJ, et al. A comparative study of three concentrations of intravenous nalbuphine combined with hydromorphone for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(5):523–529. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000678
- Monisha N, Poomalar GK. Comparison of intravenous paracetamol infusion versus intramuscular tramadol as labor analgesia: a randomized control trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(3):755–762. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06585-2
- Makharin OA, Lebedeva EA, Kochubeynik NV Conduction methods of pain relief in labor: a systematic review. Bulletin of Intensive Therapy named after A.I. Saltanov. 2022;(4):55–65. doi: 10.21320/1818-474X-2022-4-55-65
- Weiniger CF, Carvalho B, Stocki D, Einav S. Analysis of Physiological Respiratory Variable Alarm Alerts Among Laboring Women Receiving Remifentanil. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(4):1211–1218. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001644
- Smith LA, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6(6):CD007396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007396.pub3
- Lukasse M, Bratsberg AB, Thomassen K, Nøhr EA. Use of pudendal nerve block among midwives in Norway: A national cross-sectional study. Eur J Midwifery. 2022;6:34. doi: 10.18332/ejm/146690
- Helmer P, Skazel T, Wenk M, et al. S3-Leitlinie “Vaginale Geburt am Termin “aus anästhesiologischer Sicht: Wissenswertes für den Anästhesisten” [S3 guidelines on “full-term vaginal birth” from an anesthesiological perspective: Worthwhile knowledge for anesthesiologists]. Anaesthesist. 2021;70(12):1031–1039. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01024-4
- Ford JM, Owen DJ, Coughlin LB, Byrd LM. A critique of current practice of transvaginal pudendal nerve blocks: a prospective audit of understanding and clinical practice. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(5):463–465. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.771155
- Xu J, Zhou R, Su W, et al. Ultrasound-guided bilateral pudendal nerve blocks of nulliparous women with epidural labour analgesia in the second stage of labour: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e035887. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035887
- Nikpoor P, Bain E. Analgesia for forceps delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;9(9):CD008878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008878.pub2
- Adamyan LV, Artymuk NV, Belokrinitskaia TE, et al. Neuroxial methods of labor analgesia. Clinical guidelines. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2018;(5):99–110. doi: 10.17116/anaesthesiology201805199
- Delgado C, Bollag L, Van Cleve W. Neuraxial Labor Analgesia Utilization, Incidence of Postdural Puncture Headache, and Epidural Blood Patch Placement for Privately Insured Parturients in the United States (2008–2015). Anesth Analg. 2020;131(3):850–856. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004561
- Ulrikh GE, Ryazanova OV, Zabolotskii DV, et al. Spinal anesthesia during cesarean section in a patient with multi-support construction after previous correction of spinal deformity. Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology. 2023;(3):67–71. doi: 10.17116/anaesthesiology202303167
- Gonzalez MN, Trehan G, Kamel I. Pain management during labor part 2: Techniques for labor analgesia. Topics Obstetr. Gynecology. 2016; 36(12):1–8.
- Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):CD000331. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4
- Simmons SW, Cyna AM, Dennis AT, Hughes D. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(3):CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub2
- Ovechkin AM, Sokologorskiy SV. The old technique of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and new opportunities for its implementation. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2018;12(1):64–67. doi: 10.17816/RA42894
- Skupski DW, Abramovitz S, Samuels J, et al. Adverse effects of combined spinal-epidural versus traditional epidural analgesia during labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106(3):242–245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.019
- Simmons SW, Taghizadeh N, Dennis AT, et al. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10(10):CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub3
- Shakirov RT, Kinzhalova SV, Makarov RА. Neuraxial methods of pain relief in labor. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2018;15(5): 65–73. doi: 10.21292/2078-5658-2018-15-5-65-73
- Wilson SH, Wolf BJ, Bingham K, et al. Labor Analgesia Onset with Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Traditional Epidural Using a 26-Gauge Whitacre Needle and 0.125% Bupivacaine Bolus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(2):545–551. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002129
- Chau A, Bibbo C, Huang CC, et al. Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Improves Labor Analgesia Quality with Fewer Side Effects Compared with Epidural and Combined Spinal Epidural Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(2):560–569. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001798
- Tan HS, Reed SE, Mehdiratta JE, et al. Quality of Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study. Anesthesiology. 2022;136(5):678–687. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004137
- Roofthooft E, Rawal N, Van de Velde M. Current status of the combined spinal-epidural technique in obstetrics and surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2023;37(2):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2023.04.004
- Berger AA, Jordan J, Li Y, et al. Epidural catheter replacement rates with dural puncture epidural labor analgesia compared with epidural analgesia without dural puncture: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2022;52:103590. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103590
Supplementary files
