The retrobulbar block anesthesia efficacy in ophthalmic surgical interventions in patients with Asian and European upper eyelid structures



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrobulbar block (RBB) is known to be accompanied by upper eyelid edema of varying degrees is associated with moderate exophthalmos, which can adversely affect surgical conditions. It was hypothesized that differences in the anatomy of the ocular adnexa between patients of Asian and European descent may determine the different severity of edema following retrobulbar block administration.

AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of RBB and the surgeon's comfort during surgery in patients with Asian and European eyelid structures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cotrolled study was conducted involving 80 patients aged 51 to 75 years who underwent retrobulbar block analgesia during vitreoretinal surgery. Group 1 (n=40) consisted of patients with European eyelid anatomy, and Group 2 (n=40) included patients with Asian eyelid anatomy. Changes in intraocular pressure, upper eyelid thickness at various stages of block administration, preparation time for surgery, levels of analgesia, akinesia, and surgeon’s comfort were evaluated.

RESULTS: In Group 1, patients exhibited an increase in upper eyelid thickness of 0.9 ± 0.1 mm, compared to 2.8 ± 0.4 mm in Group 2 (p < 0.001), attributable to infiltration of postseptal soft tissues by the local anesthetic. Mean akinesia scores were 1.0 ± 0.2 and 1.4 ± 0.6 for Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.021), with higher scores reflecting diminished akinesia efficacy.

Following retrobulbar block (RB), intraocular pressure (IOP) in Group 1 rose to 17.6 ± 1.9 mmHg but returned to baseline (15.9 ± 1.9 mmHg) after orbital compression. In contrast, Group 2 demonstrated a significant IOP elevation post-RB (24.9 ± 6.3 mmHg; p < 0.001) and post-compression (21.5 ± 5.4 mmHg; p < 0.001), both exceeding baseline levels (16.2 ± 1.3 mmHg). Ocular hypertension necessitated prolonged preoperative preparation for IOP reduction in 5% of Group 1 and 28.75% of Group 2 patients.

Pain assessment revealed a mean VAS score of 2.6 ± 1.3 in Group 2, significantly higher than Group 1's 1.6 ± 1.5 (p < 0.001), prompting supplemental intraoperative parenteral analgesia. Surgeon comfort was compromised in Group 2 due to a reduction in palpebral fissure width from 21.4 ± 1.1 mm to 14.8 ± 1.9 mm post-RB, correlated with anesthetic infiltration of the upper eyelid.

CONCLUSIONS: Retrobulbar block in patients with Asian upper eyelid anatomy was associated with a significant increase in eyelid thickness and intraocular pressure, prolonged preparation time, the need for additional parenteral analgesia during the surgery, as well as a decreased level of comfort for the surgeon performing the procedure.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Irina Oleshchenko

Irkutsk Branch of S.Fyodorov "Eye microsurgery" Federal State Institution,

Irkutsk State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: iga.oleshenko@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1642-5276
SPIN-code: 8824-1216

PhD (medicine), head of anesthesiology and resuscitation department

Russian Federation, 337 Lermontov, Irkutsk, 664033

Alexander Mankov

Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia

Email: man-aleksandrv@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8701-6432
SPIN-code: 7135-2828

канд. мед. наук, врач анестезиолог-реаниматолог, заведующий кафедрой Анестезиологии и реаниматологии ИГМУ

Russian Federation, 1 Krasnogo vosstaniya, Irkutsk, Russia, 664003

Dmitry Zabolotskii

Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Email: zdv4330303@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6127-0798
SPIN-code: 6727-2571

д-р мед. наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой анестезиологии, реаниматологии и педиатрии им. профкссора В.И. Гордеева.

Russian Federation, 2 Litovskaya, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 194100

References

  1. Shalwala A, Hwang RY, Tabing A, Sternberg P Jr, Kim SJ. The value of preoperative medical testing for vitreoretinal surgery Retina. 2015;35(2):319-325. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000306.
  2. Gayer S, Kumar CM. Ophthalmic regional anesthesia techniques. Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;74(1-2):23-33.
  3. Kumar CM, Seet E, Chua AWY. Updates in ophthalmic anaesthesia in adults. BJA Educ. 2023 Apr;23(4):153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2023.01.003.
  4. Kumar CM. Orbital regional anesthesia: complications and their prevention. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006;54(2):77-84. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.25826.
  5. Troll GF. Regional ophthalmic anesthesia: safe techniques and avoidance of complications. J Clin Anesth. 1995 Mar;7(2):163-172. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)90001-m.
  6. Hamilton RC. A discourse on the complications of retrobulbar and peribulbar blockade. Can J Ophthalmol. 2000 ;35(7):363-72. doi: 10.1016/s0008-4182(00)80123-4.
  7. Oleshchenko IG, Mankov AV, Zabolotsky DV, Kuzmin SV. Identification of risk predictors for adverse hemorrhagic events during retinal surgery in diabetic patients on hemodialysis. Acta Biomed Sci. 2024;9(6):149-155. doi: 10.29413/ABS.2024-9.6.15.
  8. Sanford DK, Minoso y de Cal OE, Belyea DA. Response of intraocular pressure to retrobulbar and peribulbar anesthesia. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29(10):815-822.
  9. Doddy Tavianto, Ricky Aditya, Dian Irawati, Aria Annasya Comparing 0.75% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine For Peribulbar Blockade In Vitrectomy Surgery Towards Intraocular Pressure April 2024 Journal Of Social Research 3(5):1172-1178 doi: 10.55324/josr.v3i5.2085
  10. Karam A. M., Lam S. M. Management of the aging upper eyelid in the asian patient // Facial Plast. Surg. 2010;26(3):201–208.
  11. Dosan A, Doskaliev A, Auezova A, Kauysheva A, Glushkova N. Anatomical features of the upper eyelid structure in Asians during aesthetic upper blepharoplasty: A literature review. Sci Health. 2021;(3):35-43. doi: 10.34689/SH.2021.23.3.004.
  12. Kachkinbaev IK, Alybaev ME, Nguyen DB. Clinico-anatomical classification of Asian eyelids by sagittal section and its role in choosing the surgical approach to the upper eyelid. Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2021;(4):29-37. doi: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202104129.
  13. Taylor A, McLeod G. Basic pharmacology of local anaesthetics. BJA Educ. 2020;20(2):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.10.002.
  14. Nociti, J. R., Serzedo, P. S. M., Zuccolotto, E. B., Nunes, A. M. M., & Ferreira, S. B. Intraocular pressure and ropivacaine in peribulbar block: A comparative study with bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2001; 45(5): 600–602. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045005600.x
  15. Coban-Karatas M, Sizmaz S, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Canan H, Akova YA. Risk factors for intraocular pressure rise following phacoemulsification. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(3):115-8. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.99997.
  16. Oku H, Mori K, Watanabe M, et al. Risk factors for intraocular pressure elevation during the early period post cataract surgery. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2022;66(4):373-378. doi: 10.1007/s10384-022-00918-z

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ ФС 77 - 55827 от 30.10.2013 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80651 от 15.03.2021 г
.