Optimization of ultrasound navigation techniques for brachial plexus block using proximal subclavian access



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: when performing a brachial plexus block in the proximal subclavian region, the scanning plane is located deeper and posterior to the midpoint of the clavicle. There are limited data evaluating the angle of the ultrasound probe and the visualization of the brachial plexus bundles.

AIMS: evaluate visualization and positioning of the neurovascular bundle in the infraclavicular region for proximal brachial plexus block.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: the study was performed on volunteer patients at the Military Traumatology and Orthopedics Clinic of the Military Medical Academy named after. CM. Kirov.

RESULTS: during the study, it was noted that the best visualization of the brachial plexus bundles is observed at an average sensor angle of between 900 and the maximum that allows visualization of at least one of the elements of the brachial plexus 64.40 (65.70, 630) and amounted to 77.50 (77 .90, 76.50).

CONCLUSIONS: the optimal angle for performing a brachial plexus block using the proximal subclavian approach is 77.50. Optimal visualization of the brachial plexus is possible in the angle range from 900 to 64.40, which allows, when performing a blockade in this area, to select the safest trajectory of the needle, taking into account the anatomical characteristics of the patient. Further studies are needed to compare the sensor angles used in actual clinical practice with the angles obtained in our study.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vasiliy G. Tsvetkov

Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: vasilii_cvetkov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4980-597X
SPIN-code: 5316-4617
Scopus Author ID: 1119527

senior resident

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Roman E. Lakhin

Kirov Military Medical Academy

Email: doctor-lahin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6819-9691
SPIN-code: 7261-9985

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Evgeniy V. Polezhankin

Military Medical Academy. CM. Kirov

Email: doctorcygankov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-6311-1698

Head of the Department of the Clinic of Military Anesthesiology and Resuscitation

Russian Federation, 194044, st. Academician Lebedeva, 6, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Evgeniy V. Chartorizhsky

Military Medical Academy. CM. Kirov

Email: doctorcygankov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9684-9783
SPIN-code: 8909-1230

senior resident

Russian Federation, st. Academician Lebedeva, 6, St. Petersburg, Russia

Kirill Tsygankov

Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov, St. Petersburg, Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: doctorcygankov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2357-0685
SPIN-code: 7133-0503

Ph.D., lecturer at the Department of Military Anesthesiology and Reanimatology 

 

Russian Federation, Academician Lebedev street lit. Zh, St. Petersburg, 194044

References

  1. Koryachkin VA, Zabolotsky DV. The place of regional anesthesia methods in surgical anesthesia. Medicine: theory and practice. 2018;3(4):65–69. (In Russ).
  2. Koryachkin V.A. Peripheral nerve blocks and ultrasound navigation. Regional anesthesia and treatment of acute pain. 2020;14(1):4–5. doi: 10.17816/1993-6508-2020-14-1-4-5. (In Russ).
  3. Zabolotsky DV, Malashenko NS, Mankov AV. Ultrasound navigation of invasive manipulations in anesthesiology. Siberian Medical Journal (Irkutsk). 2012;113(6):15–20. (In Russ).
  4. Lakhin RE, Koryachkin VA, Uvarov DN et al. Intensive therapy for systemic toxicity with local anesthetics (clinical recommendations). Togliatti Medical Consilium. 2017;(1): 8–36. (In Russ).
  5. Zabolotsky DV, Ulrich GE, Malashenko NS et al. Ultrasound in the hands of an anesthesiologist - exclusive or routine? Regional anesthesia and treatment of acute pain. 2012;6(1):5–10. (In Russ).
  6. Ovechkin AM, Politov ME, Morozov DV. Neurological complications of regional anesthesia. Regional anesthesia and treatment of acute pain. 2018;12(1):6–14. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2018-12-1-6-14. (In Russ).
  7. Ovechkin AM., Bayalieva AZh, Ezhevskaya AA et al. Postoperative pain relief. Clinical recommendations. Bulletin of Intensive Care named after A.I. Saltanova. 2019;(4):9–33. doi: 10.21320/1818-474X-2019-4-9-33. (In Russ).
  8. Zabolotsky DV, Koryachkin VA. Child and regional anesthesia - why? Where? And How? Regional anesthesia and treatment of acute pain. 2016;10(4):243–253. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2016-10-4-243-253. (In Russ).
  9. Zabolotsky DV, Koryachkin VA, Ulrich GE. Postoperative analgesia in children. Are there methods available today? (current state of the problem). Regional anesthesia and treatment of acute pain. 2017;11(2):64–72. doi: 10.18821/1993-6508-2017-11-2-64-72. (In Russ).
  10. Nadeau MJ, Lévesque S, Dion N. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for upper limb surgery. Can J. Anaesth. 2013;60(3):304–320. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9874-6.
  11. Aliste J, Bravo D, Layera S, et al. Randomized comparison between interscalene and costoclavicular blocks for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan 11:rapm-2018-100055. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100055. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 30635497.
  12. Karmakar MK, Sala-Blanch X, Songthamwat B, et al. Benefits of the costoclavicular space for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block: description of a costoclavicular approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40(3):287-288. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000232.
  13. Demondion X, Herbinet P, Boutry N, et al. Sonographic mapping of the normal brachial plexus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(7):1303-1309.
  14. Sala-Blanch X, Reina MA, Pangthipampai P, et al. Anatomic Basis for Brachial Plexus Block at the Costoclavicular Space: A Cadaver Anatomic Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(3):387-391. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000393

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ ФС 77 - 55827 от 30.10.2013 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80651 от 15.03.2021 г
.



This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies