Rapid methods of the detection of bacteria of the genus Campylobacter in food products

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Campylobacteriosis is an acute intestinal disease caused by Campylobacter spp., which manifests with symptoms of enterocolitis and gastroenteritis. The causative agents of campylobacteriosis are C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus. The incidence of campylobacteriosis is recorded worldwide as sporadic cases and foodborne or waterborne outbreaks. The industrialization of poultry production has led both to the acceleration of the evolution of commensal pathogens from the genus of Campylobacter, increased contamination of raw products and importance Campylobacter as foodborne pathogens. 

Material and methods. The main objects were raw poultry products and swabs from the environment of poultry processing enterprises. Cultural, biochemical, immunological methods, methods for the detection of the sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics, PCR analysis were used. Results and discussion. The methods of rapid detection of thermophilic campylobacters using combined schemes of bacteriological and molecular genetic analysis are developed. Because C. jejuni makes 85–90% of food isolates of campylobacters, for the purposes of production control the detection of thermophilic Сampylobacter with a minimum set of cultural and biochemical tests of identification is allowed. This will reduce the duration of analyses up to 3-4 days and decrease their labor-cost. The control critical points of production of poultry products in which it is necessary to control the presence of thermophilic campylobacters are indicated. These are the stages of slaughter, scalding, washing, and processing on the conveyor of carcasses, contact cooling baths, the areas of semi-finished products manufacturing and the packaging. 

Conclusion. The obtained results were used to develop Guidelines “Methods of rapid determination of bacteria of the genus Campylobacter in food products and evaluation of their antibiotic resistance”.

About the authors

S. A. Sheveleva

Federal Research Center of nutrition, biotechnologies and food safety

Author for correspondence.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5647-9709
Russian Federation

Natalya R. Efimochkina

Federal Research Center of nutrition, biotechnologies and food safety

Email: karlikanova@ion.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9071-0326

MD, Ph.D., DSci., Leading researcher of the laboratory of biosafety and nutrimicrobiome analysis of the Federal Research Centre of nutrition, biotechnology and food safety, Moscow, 109240, Russian Federation.

e-mail: karlikanova@ion.ru

Russian Federation

T. V. Pichugina

Federal Research Center of nutrition, biotechnologies and food safety

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4632-7119
Russian Federation

I. B. Bykova

Federal Research Center of nutrition, biotechnologies and food safety

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7288-312X
Russian Federation

V. V. Stetsenko

Federal Research Center of nutrition, biotechnologies and food safety

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6470-171X
Russian Federation

Yu. M. Markova

Federal Research Center of nutrition, biotechnologies and food safety

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2631-6412
Russian Federation

L. P. Minaeva

Federal Research Center of nutrition, biotechnologies and food safety

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1853-5735
Russian Federation

References

  1. Ray B., Bhunia A. Fundamental Food Microbiology. Fougth Edition. CRC Press, 2008, 492 p.
  2. Sheppard S.K., Falush D. A candidate hopeful monster in the genus Campylobacter. In: Campylobacter Ecology and Evolution, ed. Sheppard S.K., 2014, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK. 359 p., ISBN: 978-1-908230-2
  3. Dasti J.I., Tareen A.M., Lugert R., Zautner A.T., Gross U. Campylobacter jejuni: a brief overview on pathogenicity-associated factors and disease-mediated mechanisms. Int. J. Med. Microbial. 2010; 3: 205-211.
  4. Nachamkin I., Guerry P. Campylobacter infections. Foodborne Pathogens: Microbiology and Molecular Biology. Wymondham, 2005: 285-293.
  5. Nachamkin I. Chronic effects of Campylobacter infections. Microbes Infect., 2002; 4: 399.
  6. Nachamkin I., Allos B.M., Ho T. Campylobacter species and Guillain-Barre syndrome. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998; 11: 555–567.
  7. World Health Organization. The global view of campylobacteriosis: report of an expert consultation, Utrecht, Netherlands, 9-11 July 2012. ISBN 978 92 4 156460 1. - www.who.int.
  8. Nohra A., Grinberg A., Midwinter A.C., Marshall J.C., Collins-Emerson J.M., French N.P.Molecular Epidemiology of Campylobacter coli Strains Isolated from Different Sources in New Zealand between 2005 and 2014.Appl. and Environ. Microbiol. 2016; 82 (14): 4363-4370.
  9. Van Dyke M.I., Morton V.K., McLellan N.L., Huck P.M. The occurrence of Campylobacter in river waterand waterfowl within a watershed in southern Ontario, Canada. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010; 109: 1053–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04730.x
  10. Eurosurveillance Editorial Team. 2012. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borneoutbreaks in 2010. Euro Surveill. 17:20113. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId?20113
  11. Mullner P., Spencer S.E., Wilson D.J., Jones G., Noble A.D., Midwinter A.C., Collins-Emerson J.M., Carter P., Hathaway S., French N.P. Assigning the source of human campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: a comparative genetic and epidemiological approach. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2009; 9: 1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2009.09.003
  12. Campylobacter Ecology and Evolution. 2014, Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK, Ed. S.K. Sheppard. 359 p., ISBN: 978-1-908230-2.
  13. GOST ISO 10272-1-2013. Microbiology of food and animal feed. Methods of detection and counting of bacteria Campylobacter spp. Part 1. Detection method.
  14. GOST ISO/TS 10272-2-2013 Microbiology of food and animal feed. Methods of detection and counting of bacteria Campylobacter spp. Part 2. Colony count technique.
  15. ISO 10272:2017. Microbiology of the food chain – Horizontal method for detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. Part 1: Detection method.
  16. Bolton F.J., Sails A.D., Fox A.J. et al. Detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in Foods by Enrichment Culture and Polymerase Chain Reaction Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. J. Food Protection, 2002; 65 (5): 760-767.
  17. Berghaus R.D., Thayer S.G., Law B.F., Mild R.M., Hofacre C.L., Singer R.S. Enumeration of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. in environmental farm samples and processing plant carcass rinses from commercial broiler chicken flocks. Appl. and Environ. Microbiology. 2013; 79 (13): 4106–4114.
  18. Seinige D., Krischek C., Klein G., Kehrenberg C. Comparative Analysis and Limitations of Ethidium Monoazide and Propidium Monoazide Treatments for the Differentiation of Viable and Nonviable Campylobacter Cells. Appl. and Environ. Microbiology. 2014; 80 (7): 2186-2192.
  19. Friesema I.H., Havelaar A.H., Westra P.P., Wagenaar J.A., van Pelt W. Poultry culling and campylobacteriosis reduction among humans, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012; 18 (3): 466-468.
  20. Stintzi A. Gene Expression Profile of Campylobacter jejuni in Response to Growth Temperature Variation. J. of Bacteriology, 2003; 185 (6): 2009–2016.
  21. Efimochkina N.R., I.B. Bykova, L.P. Minaeva, T.V. Pichugina, V.V. Stetsenko, Yu.M. Markova, Yu.V. Korotkevich, S.S. Kozak, S.A. Sheveleva. Study of the contamination and the levels of Campylobacter spp. during the processing of selected types of food. Voprosi pitanya. 2016; 85 (5): 52-59. (In Russian).
  22. Methodological guidelines 4.2.2321-08 «Methods for the determination of bacteria of the genus Campylobacter in food products». M., Federal center of hygiene and epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2008: 31.
  23. Efimochkina N.R., Pichugina T. V., Stetsenko V. V., Bykova I. B., Markova Yu. M., Korotkevich, Y. V., Polyanina, A. S., Sheveleva S. A. Optimization methods of food control, based on differential-diagnostic media for the isolation and cultivation of bacteria of the genus Campylobacter. Voprosi pitanya. 2017; 86 (5): 34-41. (In Russian).
  24. Methodological guidelines 4.2.2878-11 “ Methods for determination of bacteria of the genus Campylobacter in food. Addendum and amendments 1 to methodological guidelines 4.2.2321-08”. M., Federal Center of hygiene and epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2011. 8 p.
  25. GOST R 57989-2017 Specialized Food Products. Methods of detection of pathogenic microorganisms based on polymerase chain reaction.
  26. Methodological guidelines 4.2.2872-2011 “Methods for detection and identification of bacterial foodborne pathogens in the food products based on PCR with fluorescence detection”. M., Federal Center of hygiene and epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, 2011. 47 p.
  27. Clinical guidelines “Determination of microbial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents”, 2014.
  28. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0, January. 2015.
  29. Methodological guidelines 4.2.1890-04 “Determination of sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics”. M., Federal Center of Gossanepidnadzor of the Ministry of health of Russia, 2004. 91 p.
  30. Efimochkina N.R., Korotkevich Yu.V., Stetsenko V.V., Pichugina T.V., Bykova I.B., Markova Yu.M., Minaeva L.P., Sheveleva S.A. Antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from food products. Voprosi pitanya, 2017; 86 (1): 18-28. (In Russian).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Sheveleva S.A., Efimochkina N.R., Pichugina T.V., Bykova I.B., Stetsenko V.V., Markova Y.M., Minaeva L.P.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.