Email this article 
Two tactics to combat bourgeois historiography: S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein
- Authors: Slepenko I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 187-193
- Section: Profession and community
- URL: https://rjraap.com/2949-124X/article/view/685999
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2949124X25020252
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDRELW
- ID: 685999
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The article considers strategies of interaction of historians with ideological processes, that occurred in Soviet historical science in the early 1930s. It compares the approaches of S.A. Piontkovsky and N.L. Rubinshtein. Piontkovsky is known for his tactic of active participating in these processes, while Rubinshtein follows a passive approach that involves maximizing the use of authoritative quotes.
Full Text
About the authors
Ilya Slepenko
Institute of Russian History, Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: otech_ist@mail.ru
graduate student Russian Federation, Moscow
References
Supplementary files
