A Retrospective Analysis of the Lauren Classification in the Choice of XELOX or SOX as an Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

  • Авторлар: Wang K.1, Yu Y.2, Zhao J.3, Meng Q.4, Xu C.4, Ren J.4, Zhang Y.5, Wang Y.6, Wang G.4
  • Мекемелер:
    1. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital,
    2. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    3. Department of Digestive, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University
    4. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    5. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital,
    6. Department of Digestive, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University,
  • Шығарылым: Том 24, № 2 (2024)
  • Беттер: 147-158
  • Бөлім: Life Sciences
  • URL: https://rjraap.com/1566-5232/article/view/643970
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/0115665232247694230921060213
  • ID: 643970

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

Background:We aim to retrospectively explore the guiding value of the Lauren classification for patients who have undergone D2 gastrectomy to choose oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) or oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) as a further systemic treatment after the operation.

Methods:We collected data of 406 patients with stage III gastric cancer(GC)after radical D2 resection and regularly received XELOX or SOX adjuvant treatment after surgery and followed them for at least five years. According to the Lauren classification, we separated patients out into intestinal type (IT) GC together with non-intestinal type(NIT) GC. According to the chemotherapy regimen, we separated patients into the SOX group together with the XELOX group.

Results:Among non-intestinal type patients, the 3-year DFS rates in the SOX group and the XELOX group were 72.5%, respectively; 54.5% (P=0.037); The 5-year OS rates were 66.8% and 51.8% respectively (P=0.038), both of which were statistically significant.

Conclusion:The patients of non-intestinal type GC may benefit from the SOX regimen. Differences were counted without being statistically significant with intestinal-type GC in the SOX or XELOX groups.

Авторлар туралы

Ke Wang

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital,

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Yuanyuan Yu

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Jian Zhao

Department of Digestive, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Qianhao Meng

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Chang Xu

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Jing Ren

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Yanqiao Zhang

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital,

Email: info@benthamscience.net

Yusheng Wang

Department of Digestive, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University,

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: info@benthamscience.net

Guangyu Wang

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology,, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: info@benthamscience.net

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3): 209-49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 PMID: 33538338
  2. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): Analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 2018; 391(10125): 1023-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3 PMID: 29395269
  3. Li C, Oh SJ, Kim S, et al. Macroscopic Borrmann type as a simple prognostic indicator in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Oncology 2009; 77(3-4): 197-204. doi: 10.1159/000236018 PMID: 19729977
  4. Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, van Grieken NCT, Lordick F. Gastric cancer. Lancet 2020; 396(10251): 635-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5 PMID: 32861308
  5. Lauren P. The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma:Diffuse and so called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 1965; 64: 31-49. doi: 10.1159/000236018 PMID: 19729977
  6. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology 2020; 76(2): 182-8.
  7. Chen YC, Fang WL, Wang RF, et al. Clinicopathological variation of lauren classification in gastric cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2016; 22(1): 197-202. doi: 10.1007/s12253-015-9996-6 PMID: 26502923
  8. Corso G, Carvalho J, Marrelli D, et al. Somatic mutations and deletions of the E-cadherin gene predict poor survival of patients with gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31(7): 868-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4612 PMID: 23341533
  9. Graziano F, Arduini F, Ruzzo A, et al. Prognostic analysis of E-cadherin gene promoter hypermethylation in patients with surgically resected, node-positive, diffuse gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10(8): 2784-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0320 PMID: 15102685
  10. Hommel C, Knoedler M, Bojarski C, et al. Diffuse gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis can mimic Crohn’s disease. Case Rep Gastroenterol 2012; 6(3): 695-703. doi: 10.1159/000345385 PMID: 23185152
  11. Qiu MZ, Cai MY, Zhang DS, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of Lauren classification in gastric adenocarcinoma in China. J Transl Med 2013; 11: 58. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1602
  12. Zheng H, Takahashi H, Murai Y, et al. Pathobiological characteristics of intestinal and diffuse-type gastric carcinoma in Japan: An immunostaining study on the tissue microarray. J Clin Pathol 2006; 60(3): 273-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.038778 PMID: 16714395
  13. Kaneko S, Yoshimura T. Time trend analysis of gastric cancer incidence in Japan by histological types, 1975- 1989. Br J Cancer 2001; 84(3): 400-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1602
  14. Palestro G, Pellicano R, Fronda GR, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and intestinal metaplasia in subjects who had undergone surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma in Northwest Italy. World J Gastroenterol 2005; 11(45): 7131-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i45.7131 PMID: 16437659
  15. Pereyra L, Gómez EJ, Mella JM, et al. Adenocarcinoma gástrico difuso asociado a enfermedad de Ménétrier. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2011; 41(2): 142-5. PMID: 21894728
  16. Stiekema J, Cats A, Kuijpers A, et al. Surgical treatment results of intestinal and diffuse type gastric cancer. Implications for a differentiated therapeutic approach? Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39(7): 686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.02.026 PMID: 23498364
  17. Yamamoto E, Suzuki H, Takamaru H, Yamamoto H, Toyota M, Shinomura Y. Role of DNA methylation in the development of diffuse-type gastric cancer. Digestion 2011; 83(4): 241-9. doi: 10.1159/000320453 PMID: 21273772
  18. Berlth F, Bollschweiler E, Drebber U, Hoelscher AH, Moenig S. Pathohistological classification systems in gastric cancer: Diagnostic relevance and prognostic value. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(19): 5679-84. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i19.5679
  19. Del Arco DC, Muñoz EL, Medina OL, et al. Clinicopathological differences, risk factors and prognostic scores for western patients with intestinal and diffuse-type gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(6): 1162-74. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i6.1162
  20. Wang H, Xing XM, Ma LN, et al. Metastatic lymph node ratio and Lauren classification are independent prognostic markers for survival rates of patients with gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 2018; 15(6): 8853-62. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8497 PMID: 29844813
  21. Liu L, Wang ZW, Ji J, et al. A cohort study and meta-analysis between histopathological classification and prognosis of gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2013; 13(2): 227-34. doi: 10.2174/1871520611313020007 PMID: 22934699
  22. Lee JH, Chang KK, Yoon C, Tang LH, Strong VE, Yoon SS. Lauren histologic type is the most important factor associated with pattern of recurrence following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 2018; 267(1): 105-13. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002040 PMID: 27759618
  23. Petrelli F, Berenato R, Turati L, et al. Prognostic value of diffuse versus intestinal histotype in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 8(1): 148-63. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2017.01.10
  24. Wang K, Li E, Busuttil RA, et al. A cohort study and meta-analysis of the evidence for consideration of Lauren subtype when prescribing adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12: 1758835920930359. doi: 10.1177/1758835920930359
  25. Jiménez FP, Carmona-Bayonas A, Hernández R, et al. Lauren subtypes of advanced gastric cancer influence survival and response to chemotherapy: Real-world data from the AGAMENON national cancer registry. Br J Cancer 2017; 117(6): 775-82. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.245 PMID: 28765618
  26. Zheng Z, Jin X, He Q, et al. The efficacy of taxanes- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy for different lauren types. Medicine 2016; 95(6): e2785. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002785 PMID: 26871834
  27. Yu Y, Zhang Z, Meng Q, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of S- 1 plus oxaliplatin or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for six and eight chemotherapy cycles as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II-III gastric cancer after D2 resection. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 684627. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684627
  28. Cheng X, Yu S, Wang Y, et al. The role of oxaliplatin in the adjuvant setting of different Lauren’s type of gastric adenocarcinoma after D2 gastrectomy: A real-world study. Gastric Cancer 2019; 22(3): 587-97. doi: 10.1007/s10120-018-0895-x PMID: 30426294
  29. Huang SC, Ng KF, Yeh TS, et al. Subtraction of Epstein–Barr virus and microsatellite instability genotypes from the Lauren histotypes: Combined molecular and histologic subtyping with clinicopathological and prognostic significance validated in a cohort of 1,248 cases. Int J Cancer 2019; 145(12): 3218-30. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32215 PMID: 30771224
  30. Pattison S, Mitchell C, Lade S, Leong T, Busuttil RA, Boussioutas A. Early relapses after adjuvant chemotherapy suggests primary chemoresistance in diffuse gastric cancer. PLoS One 2017; 12(9): e0183891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183891
  31. Schirren R, Novotny A, Oesterlin C, Slotta-Huspenina J, Friess H, Reim D. Significance of lauren classification in patients undergoing neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers-analysis from a large single center cohort in germany. Cancers 2021; 13(2): 290. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020290
  32. van der Kaaij RT, Snaebjornsson P, Voncken FEM, et al. The prognostic and potentially predictive value of the Laurén classification in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2017; 76: 27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.031 PMID: 28262585
  33. Shitara K, Chin K, Yoshikawa T, et al. Phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin for patients with stage III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20(1): 175-81. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0581-1 PMID: 26626800
  34. Wang G, Zhao J, Song Y, et al. Phase II study of adjuvant chemotherapy with S1 plus oxaliplatin for Chinese patients with gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 2018; 18(1): 547. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4480-9 PMID: 29743043
  35. Zhang X, Liang H, Li Z, et al. Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): An open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22(8): 1081-92. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00297-7 PMID: 34252374
  36. Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): A phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379(9813): 315-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61873-4 PMID: 22226517
  37. Lee J, Lim DH, Kim S, et al. Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: The ARTIST trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30(3): 268-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.1953
  38. Park SH, Lim DH, Sohn TS, et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant single-agent S1, S- 1 with oxaliplatin, and postoperative chemoradiation with S- 1 and oxaliplatin in patients with node-positive gastric cancer after D2 resection: The ARTIST 2 trial. Ann Oncol 2021; 32(3): 368-74.
  39. Sasako M, Sakuramoto S, Katai H, et al. Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(33): 4387-93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5908 PMID: 22010012
  40. Yoshida K, Kodera Y, Kochi M, et al. Addition of docetaxel to oral fluoropyrimidine improves efficacy in patients with stage III gastric cancer: Interim analysis of JACCRO GC-07, a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37(15): 1296-304.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bentham Science Publishers, 2024