The manifestation of empathy in animals

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The review considers the evolutionary prerequisites for empathic behavior. Empathy refers to the ability to indirectly experience the affective states of other individual and motivate behavior aimed at helping a partner. For a long time it was believed that the manifestation of empathy is peculiar only to humans and, possibly, to primates. However, experimental studies conducted in recent decades demonstrate that empathy-like behavior, primarily affective empathy, is observed in many animals, including rodents. In rodents, empathy manifests itself in the form of emotional contagion, emotional buffering, and prosocial behavior. The article also discusses the factors influencing the manifestation of empathic behavior, as well as the brain structures and neurotransmitter systems involved in its implementation.

作者简介

M. Zaichenko

Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of RAS

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mariya-zajchenko@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 117485

参考

  1. Дельгадо X. Мозг и сознание. М. Мир. 1971. 266 с.
  2. Зайченко М.И., Михайлова Н.Г., Райгородский Ю.В. Нейроны гипоталамуса и зоосоциальные взаимодействия // Журн. высш. нерв. деят. 1996. Т. 46. № 3. С. 539–547.
  3. Зайченко М.И., Михайлова Н.Г., Райгородский Ю.В. Активность нейронов префронтальной коры мозга у крыс с разными типологическими особенностями при эмоциональных воздействиях // Журн. высш. нерв. деят. 2000. Т. 50. № 3. С. 492–499.
  4. Зайченко М.И., Мержанова Г.Х., Демина А.В. Исследование поведения “импульсивных” и “самоконтролирующих” животных методом “эмоционального резонанса” // Журн. высш. нерв. деят. 2010. Т. 60. № 2. С. 192–200.
  5. Кропоткин П.А. Взаимная помощь как фактор эволюции. С.-Петербург. Товарищество “Знание”. 1907. 153 с.
  6. Симонов П.В. Условные реакции эмоционального резонанса у крыс. В кн. Нейрофизиологический подход к анализу внутривидового поведения // М. Наука. 1976. С. 6–25.
  7. Преображенская Л.А., Симонов П.В. Условные реакции избегания при болевом раздражении другой особи // Журн. высш. нервн. деят. 1978. Т. 20. № 2. С. 379–388.
  8. Apps M.A.J., Rushworth M.F., Chang S.W. The Anterior Cingulate Gyrus and Social Cognition: Tracking the Motivation of Others // Neuron. 2016. V. 90. P. 692–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.018.
  9. Atsak P., Orre M., Bakker P. et al. Experience modulates vicarious freezing in rats: a model for empathy // PloS One. 2011; 6:e21855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021855.
  10. Baron-Cohen S., Wheelwright S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2004. V. 34. P. 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00.
  11. Bastiampillai T., Allison S., Chan S. Is depression contagious? The importance of social networks and the implications of contagion theory // Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry. 2013. V. 47. P. 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867412471437.
  12. Ben-Ami Bartal I., Decety J., Mason P. Helping a cagemate in need: empathy and pro-social behavior in rats // Science. 2011. V. 334. № 6061. P. 1427–1430. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210789
  13. Ben-Ami Bartal I., Rodgers D.A., Sarria M.S.B., Decety J., Mason P. Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience // eLife 2014;3:e01385. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01385
  14. Ben-Ami Bartal I., Shan H.Z. et al. Anxiolytic Treatment Impairs Helping. Behavior in Rats // Front. Psychol. 2016. V. 7. P. 850. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00850.
  15. Ben-Ami Bartal I., Breton J.M., Sheng H. et al. Neural correlates of ingroup bias for prosociality in rats // eLife. 2021. 10:e65582. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65582.
  16. Bjorkqvist K. Social defeat as a stressor in humans // Physiol. Behav. 2001. V. 73. P. 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00490-5.
  17. Blystad M.H., Andersen D., Johansen E.B. Female rats release a trapped cagemate following shaping of the door opening response: Opening latency when the restrainer was baited with food, was empty, or contained a cagemate // PLoS ONE. 2019. V. 14. № 10. e0223039. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223039
  18. Blystad M.H. An opinion on the interpretation of social release in rats // Biol. Lett. 2021. V. 17. P. 20210355. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0355.
  19. Boucher O., Rouleau I., Lassonde M. et al. Social information processing following resection of the insular cortex // Neuropsychologia. 2015. V. 71. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.008.
  20. Braaten E.B., Rosen L.A. Self-regulation of affect in attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and non-ADHD boys: differences in empathic responding // J. Consult Clin Psychol. 2000. V. 68. P. 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.313.
  21. Breton J.M., Eisner J.S., Gandhi V.S. et al. Neural activation associated with outgroup helping in adolescent rats // iScience. 2022. V. 25. P. 104412. https://doi.org// 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104412.
  22. Bridgman M.W., Brown W.S., Spezio M.L. et al. Facial emotion recognition in agenesis of the corpus callosum // J. Neurodev Disord. 2014. V. 6. P. 32. https://doi.org// 10.1186/1866-1955-6-32.
  23. Brook M., Kosson D.S. Impaired cognitive empathy in criminal psychopathy: evidence from a laboratory measure of empathic accuracy // J. Abnorm Psychol. 2013. V. 122. P. 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030261.
  24. Bruchey A.K., Jones C.E., Monfils M.H. Fear conditioning by-proxy: social transmission of fear during memory retrieval // Behav Brain Res. 2010. V. 214. P. 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.047.
  25. Buchanan T.W., Bagley S.L., Stansfield R.B., Preston S.D. The empathic, physiological resonance of stress // Soc. Neurosci. 2012. V. 7. P. 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2011.588723.
  26. Burkett J.P., Andari E., Johnson Z.V. et al. Oxytocin-dependent consolation behavior in rodents // Science. 2016. V. 351. P. 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4785.
  27. Butler E.A. Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: the TIES that form relationships // Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2011. V. 15. P. 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411164.
  28. Cao Y., Contreras-Huerta L.S., McFadyen J., Cunnington R. Racial bias in neural response to others’ pain is reduced with other-race contact // Cortex J. Devoted Study Nerv. Syst. Behav. 2015. V. 70. P. 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.02.010.
  29. Carnevali L., Montano N., Statello R. et al. Social stress contagion in rats: Behavioural, autonomic and neuroendocrine correlates // Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017. V. 82. P. 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.05.017.
  30. Carrillo M., Migliorati F., Bruls R. et al. Repeated witnessing of conspecifics in pain: effects on emotional contagion // PLoS One. 2015. V. 10. № 9. e0136979. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136979.
  31. Chen J. Empathy for distress in humans and rodents // Neurosci. Bull. 2018. V. 34. P. 216–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-017-0135-0.
  32. Chen J., Li Z., Lv Y.-F. et al. Empathy for pain: A novel bio-psychosocial-behavioral laboratory animal model // Acta Physiologica Sinica. 2015. V. 67. № 6. P. 561–570.
  33. Chen Q., Panksepp J.B., Lahvis G.P. Empathy is moderated by genetic background in mice // PloS One. 2009. 4:e4387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004387.
  34. Christov-Moore L., Simpson E.A., Coudé G. et al. Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior // Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2014. V. 46. P. 604–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001.
  35. Church R.M. Emotional reactions of rats to the pain of others // Journal of comparative and physiological psychology. 1959. V. 52. № 2. P. 132–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043531
  36. Cox S.S., Reichel C.M. Rats display empathic behavior independent of the opportunity for social interaction // Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020. V. 45. P. 1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0572-8.
  37. Cox S.S., Kearns A.M., Woods S.K. et al. The role of the anterior insula during targeted helping behavior in male rats // Scientific Reports. 2022. V. 12. P. 3315. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07365-3.
  38. Custance D., Mayer J. Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study // Anim Cogn. 2012. V. 15. P. 851–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0510-1.
  39. Darwin C. The Descent of man. D // Appleton and Company. 1871.
  40. Davitz J.R., Mason D.J. Socially facilitated reduction of a fear response in rats // Journal of comparative and physiological psychology. 1955. V. 48. № 3. P. 149–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046411.
  41. Decety J., Lamm C. Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience // Scientific World Journal. 2006. V. 6. P. 1146–1163. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.221.
  42. Dermody N., Wong S., Ahmed R. et al. Uncovering the neural bases of cognitive and affectiveempathy deficits in alzheimer’s disease and the behavioral-variant of frontotemporal dementia // J. AlzheimersDis. 2016. V. 53. P. 801–816. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160175.
  43. Derntl B., Seidel E.M., Schneider F., Habel U. How specific are emotional deficits? A comparison of empathic abilities in schizophrenia, bipolar and depressed patients // Schizophr Res. 2012. V. 142. P. 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2012.09.020.
  44. De Vries A.C., Glasper E.R., Detillion C.E. Social modulation of stress responses // Physiology & behavior. 2003. V. 79. № 3. P. 399—407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00152-5.
  45. De Wall F.B., Aureli F. Conflict resolution and distress alleviation in monkeys and apes // Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1997. V. 807. P. 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb51929.x.
  46. De Waal F.B. Putting the altruism back into altruism: the evolution of empathy // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008. V. 59. P. 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625.
  47. De Waal F.B.M., Preston S.D. Mammalian empathy: behavioural manifestations and neural basis // Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017. V. 18. P. 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.72.
  48. Doherty R.W., Orimoto L., Singelis T.M., Hatfield E., Hebb J. Emotional contagion: Gender and Occupational Differences // Psychol. Women Q. 1995. V. 19. P. 355–371.
  49. Donaldson Z.R., Young L.J. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality // Science. 2009. V. 322. P. 900–904. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158668.
  50. Edgar J.L., Lowe J.C., Paul E.S., Nicol C.J. Avian maternal response to chick distress // Proc. Biol. Sci. 2011. V. 278. P. 3129–3134. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2701.
  51. Engert V., Plessow F., Miller R., Kirschbaum C., Singer T. Cortisol increase in empathic stress is modulated by emotional closeness and observation modality // Psychoneuroendocrinology 2014. V. 45. P. 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.04.005.
  52. Evans M.J., Duvel A., Funk M.L. et al. Social reinforcement of operant behavior in rats: A methodological note // J. of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 1994. V. 62. P. 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1994.62-149.
  53. Ferrari V., Smeraldi E., Bottero G., Politi E. Addiction and empathy: a preliminary analysis // Neurol. Sci. 2014. V. 35. P. 855–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-013-1611-6.
  54. Fontenelle L.F., Soares I.D., Miele F. et al. Empathy and symptoms dimensions of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder // J. Psychiatr. Res. 2009. V. 43. P. 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.05.007.
  55. Gilmore A.J., Billing R.L., Einstein R. The effects on heart rate and temperature of mice and vas deferens responses to noradrenaline when their cage mates are subjected to daily restraint stress // Lab. Anim. 2008. V. 42. P. 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2007.06030e.
  56. Gonzalez-Liencres C., Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Brüne M. Towards a neuroscience of empathy: ontogeny, phylogeny, brain mechanisms, context and psychopathology // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013. V. 37. P. 1537–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.05.001.
  57. Gonzalez-Liencres C., Juckel G., Tas C., Friebe A., Brüne M. Emotional contagion in mice: the role of familiarity // Behav Brain Res. 2014. V. 263. P. 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.01.020.
  58. Gore F., Schwartz E.C., Salzman C.D. Manipulating neural activity in physiologically classified neurons: triumphs and challenges // Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015. V. 370. № 1677. P. 20140216. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0216.
  59. Grinevich V., Knobloch-Bollmann H.S., Eliava M., Busnelli M., Chini B. Assembling the Puzzle: Pathways of Oxytocin Signaling in the Brain // Biol. Psychiatry. 2016. V. 79. P. 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.013.
  60. Guastella A.J., Hickie I.B. Oxytocin Treatment, Circuitry, and Autism: A Critical Review of the Literature Placing Oxytocin Into the Autism Context // Biol. Psychiatry. 2016. V. 79. P. 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.06.028.
  61. Gur R., Tendler A., Wagner S. Long-term social recognition memory is mediated by oxytocin-dependent synaptic plasticity in the medial amygdala // Biol. Psychiatry. 2014. V. 76. P. 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.03.022.
  62. Guttman H., Laporte L. Alexithymia, empathy, and psychological symptoms in a family context // Compr Psychiatr 2002. V. 43. P. 448–455. https://doi.org/10.1053/comp.2002.35905.
  63. Guzmán Y.F., Tronson N.C., Guedea A. et al. Social modeling of conditioned fear in mice by non-fearful conspecifics // Behav Brain Res. 2009. V. 201. № 1. P. 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.02.024.
  64. Hachiga Y., Schwartz L.P., Silberberg A. et al. Does a rat free a trapped rat due to empathy or for sociality? // J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2018. V. 110. № 2. P. 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.464.
  65. Han Y., Bruls R., Soyman E. et al. Bidirectional cingulate-dependent danger information transfer across rats // PLoS Biol. 2019. V. 17. e3000524. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000524.
  66. Han Y., Sichterman B., Maria C., Gazzola V., Keysers C. Similar levels of emotional contagion in male and female rats // Scientific Reports. 2020. V. 10. P. 2763. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59680-2.
  67. Hare B., Call J., Tomasello M. Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? // Anim Behav. 2001. V. 61. P. 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1518.
  68. Hare B., Call J., Tomasello M. Chimpanzees deceive a human competitor by hiding // Cognition. 2006. V. 101. P. 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.011.
  69. Hatfield E., Cacioppo J.T., Rapson R.L. Emotional contagion // Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1994. V. 2. P. 96–99.
  70. Hernandez-Lallement J., Triumph Attah A., Soyman E., Pinhal C.M., Gazzola V., Keysers C. Harm to others acts as a negative reinforcer in rats // Current Biology. 2020. V. 30. P. 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.017.
  71. Hernandez-Lallement J., G´omez-Sotres P., Carrillo M. Towards a unified theory of emotional contagion in rodents — A meta-analysis // Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2022. V. 132. P. 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.010.
  72. Hirata S. Chimpanzee social intelligence: selfishness, altruism, and the mother-infant bond // Primates J. Primatol. 2009. V. 50. P. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-008-0122-1.
  73. Hiura L.C., Tan L., Hackenberg T.D. To free, or not to free: Social reinforcement effects in the social release paradigm with rats // Behav Processes. 2018. V. 152. P. 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.014.
  74. Hodges T.E., Green M.R., Simone J.J., McCormick C.M. Effects of social context on endocrine function and Zif268 expression in response to an acute stressor in adolescent and adult rats // Int J. Dev Neurosci. 2014. V. 35. P. 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.03.001.
  75. Ikemoto S., Panksepp J. The effects of early social isolation on the motivation for social play in juvenile rats // Developmental Psychobiology. 1992. V. 25. P. 261–274.
  76. Jeon D., Kim S., Chetana M. et al. Observational fear learning involves affective pain system and Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels in ACC // Nat Neurosci. 2010. V. 13. P. 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2504.
  77. Jeon D., Shin H.S. A mouse model for observational fear learning and the empathetic response // Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0827s57. Chapter 8:Unit 8.27 https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0827s57.
  78. Johansen J.P., Fields H.L., Manning B.H. The affective component of pain in rodents: direct evidence for a contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001. V. 98. № 14. P. 8077–82. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.141218998.
  79. Johnson Z.V., Young L.J. Oxytocin and vasopressin neural networks: Implications for social behavioral diversity and translational neuroscience // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017. V. 76. Pt A. P. 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.034.
  80. Joiner Jr. T.E. Contagious depression: existence, specificity to depressed symptoms, and the role of reassurance seeking // J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994. V. 67. P. 287–296.
  81. Karwicka W., Wiatrowska M., Kondrakiewicz K. et al. Relaying Aversive Ultrasonic Alarm Calls Depends on Previous Experience. Empathy, Social Buffering, or Panic? // Brain Sci. 2021. V. 11. P. 759. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11060759.
  82. Kavaliers M., Choleris E., Colwell D.D. Learning from others to cope with biting flies: social learning of fear-induced conditioned analgesia and active avoidance // Behavioral neuroscience. 2001. V. 115. № 3. P. 661–74.
  83. Keum S., Shin H.-S. Rodent models for studying empathy // Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2016. V. 135. P. 22–26. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.022
  84. Kikusui T., Winslow J., Mori Y. Social Buffering: Relief from Stress and Anxiety // Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2007. V. 361. P. 2215–2228. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1941.
  85. Kim E.J., Kim E.S., Covey E., Kim J.J. Social transmission of fear in rats: The role of 22-kHz ultrasonic distress vocalization // PLoS One. 2010. 5:e15077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015077.
  86. Kim S., Mátyás F., Lee S., Acsády L., Shin H.S. Lateralization of observational fear learning at the cortical but not thalamic level in mice // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2012. V. 109. P. 15497–15501. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213903109.
  87. Kim B.S., Lee J., Bang M. et al. Differential regulation of observational fear and neural oscillations by serotonin and dopamine in the mouse anterior cingulate cortex // Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014. V. 231. P. 4371–4381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3581-7.
  88. Kim S.-W., Kim M., Shin H.-S. Affective empathy and prosocial behavior in rodents // Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2021. V. 68. P. 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2021.05.002.
  89. Kiyokawa Y., Kikusui T., Takeuchi Y., Mori Y. Partner’s stress status influences social buffering effects in rats // Behav Neurosci. 2004. V. 118. № 4. P. 798–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.118.4.798.
  90. Kiyokawa Y., Takeuchi Y., Mori Y. Two types of social buffering differentially mitigate conditioned fear responses // Eur J Neurosci. 2007. V. 26. P. 3606–3613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05969.x.
  91. Kiyokawa Y., Kodama Y., Takeuchi Y., Mori Y. Physical interaction is not necessary for the induction of housing-type social buffering of conditioned hyperthermia in male rats // Behav Brain Res. 2013. V. 256. P. 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.037.
  92. Kiyokawa Y., Honda A., Takeuchi Y., Mori Y. A familiar conspecific is more effective than an unfamiliar conspecific for social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats // Behav.Brain Res. 2014. V. 267. P. 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.03.043.
  93. Kiyokawa Y. Social odors: alarm pheromones and social buffering. In Social Behavior from Rodents to Humans // Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. 2015. V. 30. Edited by Wöhr M, Krach S . Cham: Springer. P. 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2015_406.
  94. Kiyokawa Y., Li Y., Takeuchi Y. А dyad shows mutual changes during social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats // Behavioural Brain Research. 2019. V. 366. P. 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.024.
  95. Knapska E., Nikolaev E., Boguszewski P. et al. Between-subject transfer of emotional information evokes specific pattern of amygdala activation // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006. V. 103. P. 3858–3862. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0511302103.
  96. Knapska E., Mikosz M., Werka T., Maren S. Social modulation of learning in rats // Learning & Memory. 2010. V. 17. P. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.1670910.
  97. Langford D.J., Crager S.E., Shehzad Z. et al. Social modulation of pain as evidence for empathy in mice // Science. 2006. V. 312. P. 1967–1970. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128322.
  98. Lamm C., Decety J., Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain // Neuroimage. 2011. V. 54. P. 2492–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014.
  99. Latane B. Gregariousness and fear in laboratory rats // J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1969. V. 5. P. 61–69.
  100. Lau Y.C., Hinkley L.B.N., Bukshpun P. et al. Autism traits in individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2013. V. 43. P. 1106–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1653-2.
  101. Leshem M., Sherman M. Troubles shared are troubles halved: stress in rats is reduced in proportion to social propinquity // Physiol Behav. 2006. V. 89. P. 399–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.07.010.
  102. Li Z., Lu Y.F., Li C.L. et al. Social interaction with a cagemate in pain facilitates subsequent spinal nociception via activation of the medial prefrontal cortex in rats // Pain. 2014. V. 155. P. 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.03.019.
  103. Li C.-L., Yu Y., He T. et al. Validating Rat Model of Empathy for Pain: Effects of Pain Expressions in Social Partners // Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2018. V. 12. P. 242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00242.
  104. Lichtenberg N.T., Lee B., Kashtelyan V. et al. Rat behavior and dopamine release are modulated by conspecific distress // eLife 2018;7:e38090. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.38090.
  105. Lü Y.-F., Yang Y., Li C.-L. et al. The Locus Coeruleus – Norepinephrine System Mediates Empathy for Pain through Selective Up-Regulation of P2X3 Receptor in Dorsal Root Ganglia in Rats // Front. Neural. Circuits 2017. V. 11. P. 66. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2017.00066.
  106. Luа Y.F., Ren B., Ling B.F. et al. Social interaction with a cagemate in pain increases allogrooming and induces pain hypersensitivity in the observer rats // Neurosci. Lett. 2018. V. 662. P. 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.063.
  107. Luo W.-J., Lia C.-L., Geng K.-W. et al. The similar past pain experience evokes both observational contagious pain and consolation in stranger rat observers // Neuroscience Letters. 2020. V. 722. P. 134840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134840.
  108. Magen E., Konasewich P.A. Women support providers are more susceptible than men to emotional contagion following brief supportive interactions // Psychol. Women Q. 2011. V. 35. P. 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684311423912
  109. Márquez C., Rennie S.M., Costa D.F., Moita M.A. Prosocial Choice in Rats Depends on Food-Seeking Behavior Displayed by Recipients // Curr Biol CB. 2015. V. 25. P. 1736–1745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.018.
  110. Martin L.J., Tuttle A.H., Mogil J.S. The Interaction Between Pain and Social Behavior in Humans and Rodents // Curr. Topics Behav. Neurosci. 2014. V. 20. P. 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2014_287.
  111. Martin L.J., Hathaway G., Isbester K. et al. Reducing social stress elicits emotional contagion of pain in mouse and human strangers // Curr Biol. 2015. V. 25. P. 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.028.
  112. Martinez M., Multani N., Anor C.J. et al. Emotion detection deficits and decreased empathy in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease affect caregiver mood and burden // Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018. V. 10. P. 120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00120.
  113. Masserman J.H., Wechkin S., Terris W. “Altruistic” behavior in rhesus monkeys // Am J Psychiatry. 1964. V. 121. P. 584–585. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.121.6.584.
  114. Mazza M., Tempesta D., Pino M.C. et al. Neural activity related to cognitive and emotional empathy in post-traumatic stress disorder // Behav. Brain Res. 2015. V. 282. P. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.049.
  115. Meyza K.Z., Ben-Ami Bartal I., Monfils M.H., Panksepp J.B., Knapska E. The roots of empathy: through the lens of rodent models // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018. V. 76. Pt B. P. 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.028.
  116. Meyza K., Knapska E. What can rodents teach us about empathy? // Current Opinion in Psychology 2018. V. 24. P. 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.03.002.
  117. Mikosz M., Nowak A., Werka T., Knapska E. Sex differences in social modulation of learning in rats // Scientific Reports. 2015. V. 5. P. 18114. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18114.
  118. Mitre M., Marlin B.J., Schiavo J.K. et al. A Distributed network for social cognition enriched for oxytocin receptors // J. Neurosci. 2016. V. 36. № 8. P. 2517–2535. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2409-15.2016.
  119. Mogil J.S. Animal models of pain: progress and challenges // Nat Rev // Neurosci. 2009. V. 10. № 4. P. 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2606.
  120. Mogil J.S. The surprising empathic abilities of rodents // Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012. V. 16. № 3. P. 143—144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.012.
  121. Mogil J.S. Social modulation of and by pain in humans and rodents // Pain. 2015. V. 156. Suppl. 1. P. 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.j.pain.0000460341.62094.77.
  122. Morgan A.J., Jorm A.F. Self-help interventions for depressive disorders and depressive symptoms: A systematic review // Ann. Gen. Psychiatry. 2008. V. 7. P. 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-859X-7-13.
  123. Morrison A.S., Mateen M.A., Brozovich F.A. et al. Empathy for positive and negative emotions in social anxiety disorder // Behav. Res. Ther. 2016. V. 87. P. 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.10.005.
  124. Nakajima M., Görlich A., Heintz N. Oxytocin modulates female sociosexual behavior through a specific class of prefrontal cortical interneurons // Cell. 2014. V. 159. P. 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.020.
  125. Nazeri M., Nezhadi A., Shabani M. Role of Opioid System in Empathy-like Behaviours in Rats // Addict Health. 2019. V. 11. № 4. P. 216–22. https://doi.org/10.22122/ahj.v11i4.243.
  126. Nazeri M., Chamani G., Abareghi F. et al. Sensory and Affective Dimensions of Pain and Anxiety Like Behaviors Are Altered in an Animal Model of Pain Empathy // Iran J. Psychiatry 2019. V. 14. № 3. P. 221–226.
  127. Nazeri-Rezaabad M., Jamalpoor Z., Alemrajabi M.S. et al. Chronic Exposure to Morphine Leads to a Reduced Affective Pain Response in the Presence of Hyperalgesia in an Animal Model of Empathy // Addict Health 2020. V. 12. № 4. P. 251–258. https://doi.org/10.22122/ahj.v12i4.280.
  128. Nowbahari E., Scohier A., Durand J.L., Hollis K.L. Ants, cataglyphis cursor, use precisely directed rescue behavior to free entrapped relatives // PLoS ONE. 2009. 4:e6573. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006573.
  129. Owen S.F., Tuncdemir S.N., Bader P.L. et al. Oxytocin enhances hippocampal spike transmission by modulating fast-spiking interneurons // Nature. 2013. V. 500. P. 458–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12330.
  130. Panksepp J.B., Lahvis G.P. Rodent empathy and affective neuroscience // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011. V. 35. P. 1864–1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.013.
  131. Panksepp J., Panksepp J.B. Toward a cross-species understanding of empathy // Trends Neurosci. 2013. V. 36. P. 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2013.04.009.
  132. Peñagarikano O., Lázaro M.T., Lu X.H. et al. Exogenous and evoked oxytocin restores social behavior in the Cntnap2 mouse model of autism // Sci. Transl. Med. 2015. 7:271ra8. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3010257.
  133. Pisansky M.T., Hanson L.R., Gottesman I.I, Gewirtz J. C. Oxytocin enhances observational fear in mice // Nat. Commun. 2017. V. 8. P. 2102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02279-5.
  134. Preston S.D., de Waal F.B.M. Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases // Behav Brain Sci. 2002. V. 25. P. 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02000018.
  135. Ramirez S., Liu X., MacDonald C.J. et al. Activating positive memory engrams suppresses depression-like behaviour // Nature. 2015. V. 522 № 7556. P. 335–339. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14514.
  136. Rein B., Jones E., Tuy S. et al. Protocols for the social transfer of pain and analgesia in mice // STAR Protocols. 2022. V. 3. № 4. P. 101756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101756.
  137. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nat. Rev // Neurosci. 2016. V. 17. P. 757–765. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.135.
  138. Rozanski A., Blumenthal J.A., Davidson K.W., Saab P.G., Kubzansky L. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005. V. 45. P. 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.005.
  139. Sanders J., Mayford M., Jeste D. Empathic fear responses in mice are triggered by recognition of a shared experience // PLoS One. 2013. 8. e74609. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074609
  140. Sato N., Tan L., Tate K., Okada M. Rats demonstrate helping behavior toward a soaked conspecific // Anim Cogn. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2015. V. 18. № 5. P. 1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0872-2.
  141. Silva P.R.R., Silva R.H., Lima R.H. et al. Are There Multiple Motivators for Helping Behavior in Rats? // Front. Psychol. 2020. V. 11. P. 1795. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01795.
  142. Singer T., Seymour B., O’Doherty J. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain // Science. 2004. V. 303. P. 1157–1162. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093535.
  143. Singer T., Lamm C. The social neuroscience of empathy // Ann N Y Acad. Sci. 2009. V. 1156. P. 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107925.
  144. Schneeberger K., Dietz M., Taborsky M. Reciprocal cooperation between unrelated rats depends on cost to donor and benefit to recipient // BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2012. V. 12. P. 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-12-41.
  145. Schwartz L.P., Silberberg A., Casey A.H., Kearns D.N., Slotnick B. Does a Rat Release a Soaked Conspecific Due to Empathy? // Anim. Cogn. 2017. V. 20. №. 2. P. 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1052-8.
  146. Silberberg A., Allouch C., Sandfort S. et al. Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain “rescue” behavior in rats // Anim Cogn. 2014. V. 17. №. 3. P. 609–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0692-1.
  147. Silva P.R.R., Silva R.H., Lima R.H. et al. Are there multiple motivators for helping behavior in rats? // Front. Psychol. 2020. V. 11. P. 1795. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01795.
  148. Simner M.L. Newborn’s response to the cry of another infant // Dev. Psychol. 1971. V. 5. P. 136–150.
  149. Singer T., Seymour B., O’doherty J. et al. Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain // Science. 2004. V. 303. № 5661. P. 1157-62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1093535.
  150. Sivaselvachandran S., Acland E.L., Abdallah S., Martin L.J. Behavioral and mechanistic insight into rodent empathy // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016. V. 91. P. 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.007.
  151. Slavich G.M. Life stress and health: a review of conceptual issues and recent findings // Teach. Psychol. 2016. V. 43. P. 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628316662768.
  152. Smith P., Berdoy M., Smith R.H. Body-weight and social-dominance in anticoagulant-resistant rats // Crop Prot. 1994. V. 13. P. 311–315.
  153. Smith A.S, Wang Z. Hypothalamic oxytocin mediates social buffering of the stress response // Biol. Psychiatry. 2014. V. 76. P. 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-2194(94)90022-1
  154. Smith A.S., Williams Avram S.K., Cymerblit-Sabba A., Song J., Young W.S. Targeted activation of the hippocampal CA2 area strongly enhances social memory // Mol. Psychiatry. 2016. V. 21. № 8. P. 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.189.
  155. Smith M.L., Asada N., Malenka R.C. Anterior cingulate inputs to nucleus accumbens control the social transfer of pain and analgesia // Science. 2021. V. 371. P. 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3040.
  156. Soto J.A., Levenson R.W. Emotion recognition across cultures: the influence of ethnicity on empathic accuracy and physiological linkage // Emotion. 2009. V. 9. P. 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017399.
  157. Strike P.C., Steptoe A. Psychosocial factors in the development of coronary artery disease // Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2004. V. 46. P. 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2003.09.001.
  158. Telzer E.H., Humphreys K.L., Shapiro M., Tottenham N. Amygdala sensitivity to race is not present in childhood but emerges over adolescence // J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2013. V. 25. P. 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00311.
  159. Thoma P., Zalewski I., von Reventlow H.G. et al. Cognitive and affective empathy in depression linked to executive control // Psychiatr. Res. 2011. V. 189. P. 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.07.030.
  160. Tremblay S., Sharika K.M., Platt M.L. Social decision-making and the brain: a comparative perspective // Trends Cogn. Sci. 2017. V. 21. № 4. P. 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.007.
  161. Toller G., Adhimoolam B., Grunwald T. et al. Right mesial temporal lobe epilepsy impairs empathy-related brain responses to dynamic fearful faces // J. Neurol 2015. V. 262. P. 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7622-2.
  162. Uddin L.Q., Nomi J.S., Hébert-Seropian B., Ghaziri J., Boucher O. Structure and function of the human insula // J. Clin. Neurophysi. 2017. V. 34. № 4. P. 300–306. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000377.
  163. Ueno H., Suemitsu S., Murakami S. et al. Helping-Like Behaviour in Mice Towards Conspecifics Constrained Inside Tubes // Scientific. Reports. 2019. V. 9. P. 5817. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42290-y
  164. Van Wolkenten M., Brosnan S.F., de Waal F.B.M. Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2007. V. 104. № 47. P. 18854–18859. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707182104.
  165. Vasconcelos M., Hollis K., Nowbahari E., Kacelnik A. Pro-sociality without empathy // Biol. Lett. 2012. V. 8. P. 910–912. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2012.0554.
  166. Venniro M., Golden S.A. Taking action: empathy and social interaction in rats // Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020. V. 45. P. 1081–1082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0596-0.
  167. Watanabe S., Ono K. An experimental analysis of “empathic”response: effects of pain reactions of pigeon upon other pigeon’s operant behavior // Behav. Processes. 1986. V. 13. P. 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(86)90089-6.
  168. Yamagishi A., Lee J., Sato N. Oxytocin in the anterior cingulate cortex is involved in helping behavior // Behavioural Brain Research. 2020. V. 393. P. 112790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112790.
  169. Yang H., Jung S., Seo J. et al. Altered behavior and neural activity in conspecific cagemates co-housed with mouse models of brain disorders // Physiol. Behav. 2016. V. 163. P. 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.031.
  170. Young W.S., Li J., Wersinger S.R., Palkovits M. The vasopressin 1b receptor is prominent in the hippocampal area CA2 where it is unaffected by restraint stress or adrenalectomy // Neuroscience. 2006. V. 143. № 4. P. 1031–1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.040.
  171. Yu Y., Li C-L., Du R., Chen J. Rat Model of Empathy for Pain // Bio-protocol. 2019. V. 9. № 12. e3266. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.3266.
  172. Zaki J. Empathy: a motivated account // Psychol. Bull. 2014. V. 140. P. 1608–1647. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037679.
  173. Zaniboni C.R., Pelarin V., Baptista-de-Souza D., De Souza L.M.D.C. Empathy for pain: Insula inactivation and systemic treatment with midazolam reverses the hiperalgesia induced by cohabitation with a pair in chronic pain condition // Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. 2018. V. 12. P. 278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00278.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025