Hexagonal borophene stabilized by mixed doping: structure, stability, electronic and mechanical properties

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Using DFT calculations, the possibility of stabilizing the hexagonal honeycomb shape of borophene by mixed doping in the B6Ga2Mg4 system was showed, where a flat sheet of borophene is placed between two layers formed by magnesium and gallium atoms. B6Ga2Mg4 is a relatively soft material with metallic conductivity. Evaluation of the thermodynamic stability of this compound shows that melting will occur at temperatures above 1200 K.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

D. Steglenko

Southern Federal University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: dvsteglenko@sfedu.ru

Institute of Physical and Organic Chemistry

Ресей, Rostov-on-Don, 344090

T. Gribanova

Southern Federal University

Email: dvsteglenko@sfedu.ru

Institute of Physical and Organic Chemistry

Ресей, Rostov-on-Don, 344090

R. Minyaev

Southern Federal University

Email: dvsteglenko@sfedu.ru

Institute of Physical and Organic Chemistry

Ресей, Rostov-on-Don, 344090

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Novoselov K.S., Geim A.K., Morozov S.V. et al. // Science. 2004. V. 306. № 5696. P. 666. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896
  2. Castro Neto A.H., Guinea F., Peres N.M.R. et al. // Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009. V. 81. № 1. P. 109. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109
  3. Yang X., Xu M., Qiu W. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2011. V. 21. № 22. P. 8096. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm10697j
  4. Wang Q.H., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Kis A. et al. // Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012. V. 7. № 11. P. 699. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.193
  5. Radisavljevic B., Radenovic A., Brivio J. et al. // Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011. V. 6. № 3. P. 147. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.279
  6. Chen Y.L., Analytis J.G., Chu J.-H. et al. // Science. 2009. V. 325. № 5937. P. 178. https://doi.org/0.1126/science.1173034
  7. Jariwala D., Sangwan V.K., Lauhon L.J. et al. // ACS Nano. 2014. V. 8. № 2. P. 1102. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn500064s
  8. Miao N., Xu B., Bristowe N.C. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017. V. 139. № 32. P. 11125. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b05133
  9. Kumar H., Frey N.C., Dong L. et al. // ACS Nano. 2017. V. 11. № 8. P. 7648. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b02578
  10. Tan C., Cao X., Wu X.-J. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2017. V. 117. № 9. P. 6225. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00558
  11. Xu M., Liang T., Shi M. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2013. V. 113. № 5. P. 3766. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300263a
  12. Gribanova T.N., Minyaev R.M., Minkin V.I. et al. // Struct. Chem. 2020. V. 31. № 6. P. 2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-020-01606-9
  13. Kaneti Y.V., Benu D.P., Xu X. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2022. V. 122. № 1. P. 1000. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00233
  14. Yadav S., Sadique M.A., Kaushik A. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. B. 2022. V. 10. № 8. P. 1146. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb02277f
  15. Wang Z.-Q., Lü T.-Y., Wang H.-Q. et al. // Front. Phys. 2019. V. 14. № 3. P. 33403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-019-0884-5
  16. An J.M., Pickett W.E. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001. V. 86. № 19. P. 4366. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4366
  17. Kortus J., Mazin I.I., Belashchenko K.D. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001. V. 86. № 20. P. 4656. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4656
  18. Choi H.J., Roundy D., Sun H. et al. // Nature. 2002. V. 418. № 6899. P. 758. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00898
  19. Gribanova T.N., Minyaev R.M., Minkin V.I. // Chem. Phys. 2019. V. 522. P. 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2019.02.008
  20. Gribanova T.N., Minyaev R.M., Minkin V.I. // Struct. Chem. 2018. V. 29. № 1. P. 327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-1031-y
  21. Gribanova T.N., Minyaev R.M., Minkin V.I. // Struct. Chem. 2017. V. 28. № 2. P. 357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-016-0886-7
  22. Gribanova T.N., Minyaev R.M., Minkin V.I. // Mendeleev Commun. 2016. V. 26. № 6. P. 485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2016.11.008
  23. Steglenko D.V., Gribanova T.N., Minyaev R.M. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023. V. 127. № 31. P. 15533. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02427
  24. John D., Nharangatt B., Chatanathod R. // J. Mater. Chem. C. 2019. V. 7. № 37. P. 11493. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9tc03628h
  25. Tang H., Ismail-Beigi S. // Phys. Rev. B. 2009. V. 80. № 13. P. 134113. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.134113
  26. Penev E.S., Kutana A., Yakobson B.I. // Nano Lett. 2016. V. 16. № 4. P. 2522. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00070
  27. Steglenko D.V., Gribanova T.N., Minyaev R.M. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2023. V. 68. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0036023622601477
  28. Kresse G., Hafner J. // Phys. Rev. B. 1993. V. 47. № 1. P. 558. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558
  29. Kresse G., Hafner J. // Phys. Rev. B. 1994. V. 49. № 20. P. 14251. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251
  30. Kresse G., Furthmüller J. // Phys. Rev. B. 1996. V. 54. № 16. P. 11169. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
  31. Kresse G., Furthmüller J. // Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996. V. 6. №. 1. P. 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
  32. Perdew J.P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996. V. 77. № 18. P. 3865. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
  33. Blöchl P.E. // Phys. Rev. B. 1994. V. 50. № 24. P. 17953. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
  34. Kresse G., Joubert D. // Phys. Rev. B. 1999. V. 59. № 3. P. 1758. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
  35. Monkhorst H.J., Pack J.D. // Phys. Rev. B. 1976. V. 13. № 12. P. 5188. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
  36. Togo A., Tanaka I. // Scripta Mater. 2015. V. 108. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021
  37. Nosé S. // J. Chem. Phys. 1984. V. 81. № 1. P. 511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447334
  38. Koichi M., Fujio I. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011. V. 44. № 6. P. 1272. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970
  39. Stokes H.T., Hatch D.M. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2005. V. 38. № 1. P. 237. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804031528
  40. Emsley J. The elements. Oxford, 1991.
  41. Mouhat F., Coudert F.-X. // Phys. Rev. B. 2014. V. 90. № 22. P. 224104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104
  42. Lubarda V.A., Chen M.C. // J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 2008. V. 3. № 1. P. 153. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2008.3.153
  43. Wei X., Fragneaud B., Marianetti C.A. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2009. V. 80. № 20. P. 205407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.205407
  44. Cadelano E., Palla P.L., Giordano S. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2010. V. 82. № 23. P. 235414. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.235414
  45. Klintenberg M., Lebègue S., Ortiz C. et al. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2009. V. 21. № 33. P. 335502. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/33/335502
  46. Lee C., Wei X., Kysar J.W. et al. // Science. 2008. V. 321. № 5887. P. 385. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1157996
  47. Kudin K.N., Scuseria G.E., Yakobson B.I. // Phys. Rev. B. 2001. V. 64. № 23. P. 235406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.235406
  48. Peng Q., Ji W., De S. // Comput. Mater. Sci. 2012. V. 56. P. 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.12.029
  49. Falin A., Cai Q., Santos E.J.G. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2017. V. 8. № 1. P. 15815. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15815
  50. Cooper R.C., Lee C., Marianetti C.A. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2013. V. 87. № 3. P. 035423. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.035423
  51. Bertolazz S., Brivio J., Kis A. // ACS Nano. 2011. V. 5. № 12. P. 9703. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn203879f
  52. Steglenko D.V., Tkachenko N.V., Boldyrev A.I. et al. // J. Comput. Chem. 2020. V. 41. № 15. P. 1456. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.26189
  53. Fedik N., Steglenko D.V., Muñoz-Castro A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021. V. 125. № 31. P. 17280. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02939
  54. Peng Q., Wen X., De S. // RSC Adv. 2013. V. 3. № 33. P. 13772. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra41347k
  55. Şahin H., Cahangirov S., Topsakal M. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2009. V. 80. № 15. P. 155453. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.155453
  56. Ding J., Xu M., Guan P.F. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 140. № 6. P. 064501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4864106
  57. Sun J., Liu P., Wang M. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2020. V. 10. № 1. P. 3408. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60416-5

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. The structure of the two-dimensional system B6Ga2Mg4. Boron atoms forming the honeycomb structure are shown in green, magnesium and gallium atoms located in the apical position are shown in orange and light green, respectively: a - top view, b - side view.

Жүктеу (150KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Top view and structure of the unit cell of the two-dimensional system B6Ga2Mg4 (a), side view of a surface fragment (b).

Жүктеу (203KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Calculated dispersion curves of the phonon spectrum along the path G–M–K–G (a) and the density of phonon states (b) for B6Ga2Mg4.

Жүктеу (101KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Electronic band structure of B6Ga2Mg4 along the path G–M–K–G (a) and the density of electron states (b).

Жүктеу (151KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Partial density of electron states formed by boron atoms. The Fermi level is marked by the vertical dashed line.

Жүктеу (79KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Partial density of electron states formed by gallium atoms. The Fermi level is marked with a vertical dotted line.

Жүктеу (89KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Partial density of electron states formed by magnesium atoms. The Fermi level is marked by the vertical dashed line.

Жүктеу (79KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 8. Pair correlation function (PCF) calculated for two-dimensional B6Ga2Mg4 at different temperatures (a); a 4 × 4 × 1 surface fragment at 1000 (b), 1200 (c), and 1300 K (d).

Жүктеу (491KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025