Sinthesis and Properties of Hard Carbon Materials Made of Molybdenum-Doped Viscose Fiber for Negative Electrodes of Sodium-Ion Batteries

V. V. Zheleznov; Железнов В. В.; N. S. Saenko; Саенко Н. С.; V. Yu. Maiorov; Майоров В. Ю.; A. Yu. Ustinov; Устинов А. Ю.; T. A. Sokol’nitskaya; Сокольницкая Т. А.; V. G. Kuryavyi; Курявый В. Г.; D. Kh. Shlik; Шлык Д. Х.; A. A. Sokolov; Соколов А. А.; D. P. Opra; Опра Д. П.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X22600931

Sinthesis and Properties of Hard Carbon Materials Made of Molybdenum-Doped Viscose Fiber for Negative Electrodes of Sodium-Ion Batteries

Authors: Zheleznov V.V.¹, Saenko N.S.¹, Maiorov V.Y.¹, Ustinov A.Y.¹, Sokol’nitskaya T.A.¹, Kuryavyi V.G.¹, Shlik D.K.¹, Sokolov A.A.¹, Opra D.P.¹
Affiliations:
1. Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 68, No 3 (2023)
Pages: 373-382
Section: НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ И НАНОМАТЕРИАЛЫ
URL: https://rjraap.com/0044-457X/article/view/665291
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22600931
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JBIXIM
ID: 665291

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Herein, a method for the preparation of hard carbon via carbonization of chemically modified (molybdenum-doped) commercially available viscose fiber was developed. The effects of a molybdenum dopant on carbonization conditions were studied. The carbonization products retained the fibrous structure and flexibility. The structural features of the synthesized hard carbon materials were investigated, and their relationships to the carbonization temperature and the amount of the molybdenum dopant were analyzed. The texture of materials was studied, and correlations between the specific surface area and porosity, on the one hand, and the synthesis conditions, on the other, were discovered. The usefulness of the products as anode materials for sodium-ion batteries was evaluated. The electrochemical tests, together the extant relevant data, indicate that molybdenum induces the structural rearrangement of the carbon framework upon annealing, accompanied by the growth and ordering of graphite-like nanoclusters. The material prepared at 1050°C exhibited the best electrochemical performances among the synthesized products and the stable cyclability with a capacity of 290 (mA h)/g at a current density of 25 mA/g.

Keywords

hard carbon, viscose, heteroatomic doping, molybdenum, anode material

References

Xie F., Xu Z., Guo Z. et al. // Prog. Energy. 2020. V. 2. № 4. P. 042002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1083/aba5f5
Ma J., Li Y., Grundish N.S. et al. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2021. V. 54. № 18. P. 183001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/abd353
Xu G., Amine R., Abouimrane A. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2018. V. 8. № 14. P. 1702403. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702403
Mukherjee S., Bin Mujib S., Soares D. et al. // Materials (Basel). 2019. V. 12. P. 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12121952
Yu P., Tang W., Wu F.-F. et al. // Rare Met. 2020. V. 39. № 9. P. 1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-020-01443-z
Simone V., Boulineau A., de Geyer A. et al. // J. Energy Chem. 2016. V. 25. № 5. P. 761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2016.04.016
Li Y., Hu Y.-S., Titirici M.-M. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2016. V. 6. № 18. P. 1600659. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600659
Yamamoto H., Muratsubaki S., Kubota K. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018. V. 6. № 35. P. 16844. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA05203D
Hou H., Qiu X., Wei W. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2017. V. 7. № 24. P. 1602898. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602898
Wang W., Li W., Wang S. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018. V. 6. № 15. P. 6183. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta10823k
Zhu Z., Liang F., Zhou Z. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018. V. 6. № 4. P. 1513. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA07951F
Zhang H., Huang Y., Ming H. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020. V. 8. № 4. P. 1604. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA09984K
Шандаков С.Д., Вершинина А.И., Ломакин М.В. и др. // Вестн. Кемеровского гос. ун-та. 2015. Т. 2. № 5. С. 127.
Ге Ч., Фан Ж., Шен Л. и др. // Электрохимия. 2019. Т. 55. № 10. С. 1236. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0424857019080061
Сморгонская Э.А., Звонарева Т.К., Иванова Е.И. и др. // Физика твердого тела. 2003. Т. 45. № 9. С. 1579.
Li Y., Ni B., Li X. et al. // Nano-Micro Lett. 2019. V. 11. № 1. P. 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0291-z
Xu D., Chen C., Xie J. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2016. V. 6. № 6. P. 1501929. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501929
Li Z., Bommier C., Chong Z. Sen et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2017. V. 7. № 18. P. 1602894. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602894
Zhu C., Mu X., van Aken P.A. et al. // Angew. Chem. 2014. V. 126. № 8. P. 2184. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201308354
David L., Bhandavat R., Singh G. // ACS Nano. 2014. V. 8. № 2. P. 1759. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn406156b
Zeng L., Zhang L., Liu X. et al. // Polymers (Basel). 2020. V. 12. № 9. P. 2134. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12092134
Xie X., Makaryan T., Zhao M. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2016. V. 6. № 5. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502161
Литвинская В.В., Хохлова Г.П., Кряжев Ю.Г. // Химия твердого топлива. 2003. Т. 2. С. 51.
Sisu C., Iordanescu R., Stanciu V. et al. // Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures. 2016. V. 11. № 2. P. 435.
Saenko N.S., Ziatdinov A.M. // Mater. Today Proc. 2018. V. 5. № 12. P. 26052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.08.028
Thommes M., Kohn R., Fruba M. // J. Phys. Chem. B. 2000. V. 104. № 33. P. 7932. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp994133m
Jagiello J., Thommes M. // Carbon. 2004. V. 42. № 7. P. 1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.01.022
Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A.V. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2015. V. 87. № 9–10. P. 1051. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
Fujimoto H., Shiraishi M. // Carbon. 2001. V. 39. P. 1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00308-0
Fujimoto H. // Carbon. 2003. V. 41. P. 1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00116
Boruah R.K., Saikia B.K., Baruah B.P. et al. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2008. V. 41. № 1. P. 27. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889807049655
Biennier L., Georges R., Chandrasekaran V. et al. // Carbon. 2009. V. 47. № 14. P. 3295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.050
Biscoe J., Warren B.E. // J. Appl. Phys. 1942. V. 13. № 6. P. 364. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1714879
Oberlin A., Bonnamy S., Oshida K. // Tanso. 2006. V. 224. P. 281.
Ziatdinov A.M., Saenko N.S., Skrylnik P.G. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020. V. 65. № 1. P. 133. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023620010210
Dresselhaus M.S., Dresselhaus G. // Adv. Phys. 1981. V. 30. № 2. P. 139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00018738100101367
Xu K., Pan Q., Zheng F. et al. // Front. Chem. 2019. V. 7. P. 733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00733
Bobyleva Z.V., Drozhzhin O.A., Dosaev K.A. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2020. V. 354. P. 136647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136647
Zhao J., Zhao L., Chihara K. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2013. V. 244. P. 752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.109
Li Y., Zhang L., Wang X. et al. // Research. 2019. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/6930294
Han J., Johnson I., Lu Z. et al. // Nano Lett. 2021. V. 21. № 15. P. 6504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c01595
Yu P., Zhang W., Yang Y. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021. V. 582. P. 852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.063