Low-Temperature N2 and He Separation on a HKUST-1 Membrane

I. V. Grenev; Гренев И. В.; V. Yu. Gavrilov; Гаврилов В. Ю.

doi:10.31857/S0044185623700584

Low-Temperature N2 and He Separation on a HKUST-1 Membrane

Authors: Grenev I.V.¹^,2, Gavrilov V.Y.²
Affiliations:
1. Novosibirsk State University
2. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis
Issue: Vol 59, No 5 (2023)
Pages: 485-490
Section: ФИЗИКО-ХИМИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОЦЕССЫ НА МЕЖФАЗНЫХ ГРАНИЦАХ
URL: https://rjraap.com/0044-1856/article/view/663913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044185623700584
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PRNJJZ
ID: 663913

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Technologies of membrane-based gas separation can be integrated into existing industrial processes for low-temperature helium recovery from natural gas at the stages of crude helium separation from the N2/He mixture and its purification. The effectiveness of these processes is most affected by the properties of the materials from which the membrane is made. Due to their unique properties, metal-organic framework are promising materials for use in gas separation. In the present work, both the Monte Carlo and equilibrium molecular dynamics methods were employed to examine the temperature dependence of membrane selectivity and nitrogen permeability for separation of an equimolar mixture of N2 and He by a HKUST-1-based membrane at a pressure drop of 0.1, 0.3, and 1 MPa. It was shown that the selection of optimal temperature conditions made it possible to obtain a significant increase in membrane selectivity and permeability for nitrogen compared to corresponding parameters at room temperature.

About the authors

I. V. Grenev

Novosibirsk State University; Boreskov Institute of Catalysis

Email: greneviv@catalysis.ru
630090, Novosibirsk, Russia; 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

V. Yu. Gavrilov

Boreskov Institute of Catalysis

Author for correspondence.
Email: greneviv@catalysis.ru
630090, Novosibirsk, Russia

References

Rufford T.E. et al. // Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2014. V. 32. № 1. P. 49–72.
Scholes C.A., Ghosh U. // J. Membr. Sci. 2016. V. 520. P. 221–230.
Dai Z. et al. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021. V. 274. P. 119044.
Scholes C.A. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018. V. 57. № 10. P. 3792–3799.
Alders M., Winterhalder D., Wessling M. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017. V. 189. P. 433–440.
Moghadam P.Z. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2017. V. 29. № 7. P. 2618–2625.
Chung Y.G. et al. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2019. V. 64. № 12. P. 5985–5998.
Altintas C. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. V. 10. № 20. P. 17257–17268.
Altintas C. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019. V. 7. № 16. P. 9593–9608.
Solanki V.A., Borah B. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2020. V. 124. № 8. P. 4582–4594.
Zarabadi-Poor P., Marek R. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019. V. 123. № 6. P. 3469–3475.
Daglar H., Keskin S. // Adv. Theory Simul. 2019. V. 2. № 11. P. 1900109.
Budhathoki S. et al. // Energy Environ. Sci. 2019. V. 12. № 4. P. 1255–1264.
Grenev I.V., Gavrilov V.Yu. // Molecules. 2022. V. 28. № 1. P. 20.
Ye P. et al. // AIChE J. 2016. V. 62. № 8. P. 2833–2842.
Yu L. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 2022. V. 644. P. 120113.
Chui S.S. // Science. 1999. V. 283. № 5405. P. 1148–1150.
Cao F. et al. // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012. V. 51. № 34. P. 11274–11278.
Lu C. et al. // Materials. 2018. V. 11. № 7. P. 1207.
Guo Y. et al. // Chemistry Select. 2016. V. 1. № 1. P. 108–113.
Mayo S.L., Olafson B.D., Goddard W.A. // J. Phys. Chem. 1990. V. 94. № 26. P. 8897–8909.
Rappe A.K. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992. V. 114. № 25. P. 10024–10035.
Potoff J.J., Siepmann J.I. // AIChE J. 2001. V. 47. № 7. P. 1676–1682.
Hirschfelder J.O., Curtiss C.F., Bird R.B. Molecular theory of gases and liquids. New York: Wiley, 1954. 1219 p.
Nazarian D., Camp J.S., Sholl D.S. // Chem. Mater. 2016. V. 28. № 3. P. 785–793.
Nazarian D. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2017. V. 29. № 6. P. 2521–2528.
Dubbeldam D. et al. // Mol. Simul. 2016. V. 42. № 2. P. 81–101.
Krishna R., van Baten J.M. // J. Membr. Sci. 2010. V. 360. № 1–2. P. 323–333.
Sava Gallis D.F. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2015. V. 27. № 6. P. 2018–2025.
Chowdhury P. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009. V. 117. № 1–2. P. 406–413.
Span R. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2000. V. 29. № 6. P. 1361–1433.
Vaezi M.J. et al. // Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes. Elsevier, 2019. P. 185–203.
Handbook of Membrane Separations: Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Food, and Biotechnological Applications. 0 ed. / ed. Pabby A.K., Rizvi S.S.H., Requena A.M.S. CRC Press, 2008.
Zito P.F. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 2018. V. 564. P. 166–173.