Concept of technogenic risk management
- 作者: Antsiferova A.A.1, Demin V.A.1,2, Demin V.F.1,3, Soloviev V.Y.2
-
隶属关系:
- National Research Center “Kurchatov institute”
- A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
- Centre for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health
- 期: 卷 96, 编号 8 (2017)
- 页面: 780-785
- 栏目: DISCUSSIONS
- ##submission.datePublished##: 21.10.2020
- URL: https://rjraap.com/0016-9900/article/view/640682
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2017-96-8-780-785
- ID: 640682
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
There are proposed conceptual positions and levels of decision-making on provision of the safety, social and medical protection of the human on the base of the assessment, analysis and risk management in different areas of human activity in normal and emergency conditions under the exposure to man-made and some natural hazard sources. At the base of developed applications there is a unified approach to the development and use of modern risk assessment methodology: the elaboration of a common method of the risk assessment and, basing on it, specific and simplified methods for concrete sources of hazard impact. This structure of methodological bases of risk assessment, in its full development makes it more transparent and comparable as well specific methods, as the support of decision-making on protective and other measures from different sources of danger. There were formulated proposals for universal safety standards (SSs) and other levels of decision-making on safety, social and medical protection of the population and staff of hazardous industries, including acceptable levels of risk. For the establishment of SSs and other decision-making levels, a special risk index is used: the relative damage (ratio of years of life lost to a year of stay-at-risk). This index is most appropriate for evaluation, comparison and management of risk, especially in conditions of two or more acting danger sources. On the base of universal SSs there are developed branch main SSs for certain isolated sources of danger. They are expressed in those indices (specific risk indices or impact indices in their different definitions), which by now are widely used in the practice or will be chosen for practical use in the future. In the ensuring human safety in normal conditions, the main use of the risk assessment is the development and support of SSs and other levels of decision-making. In emergencies the specific risk assessment besides to the establishment the decision-making levels is essentially needed to make justified optimal decisions on the measures of social and medical protection of the population and professionals.
作者简介
A. Antsiferova
National Research Center “Kurchatov institute”
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
俄罗斯联邦
V. Demin
National Research Center “Kurchatov institute”; A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
俄罗斯联邦
Vladimir Demin
National Research Center “Kurchatov institute”; Centre for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health
Email: vfdemin_kiae@mail.ru
MD, PhD, leading researcher, National Research Center “Kurchatov institute”, 123182 Moscow, Russian Federation.
e-mail: vfdemin_kiae@mail.ru
俄罗斯联邦V. Soloviev
A.I. Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of Federal Medical Biological Agency
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
俄罗斯联邦
参考
- Demin V.F., Romanov V.V., Solov’ev V.Yu. A harmonized approach to safety regulation in the various areas of human activity. Meditsinskaya radiologiya i radiatsionnaya bezopasnost’. 2012; 57 (5): 20–30. (in Russian)
- Rakhmanin Yu.A., Demin V.F., Ivanov S.I. Common approach to evaluation, comparison and standardization of health risk from different sources of harm. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2006; (4): 5–9. (in Russian)
- ICRP, 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007; 37 (2–4).
- SanPin 2.6.1.2523-09. Standards of radiation safety (NRB – 99/2009). Moscow; 2009. (in Russian)
- Avaliani S.L., Bezpal’ko L.E., Bobkova T.E., Mishina A.L. Рerspective directions of developing risk analysis methodology in Russia. Gigiena i sanitariya. 2013; 92 (1): 33–5. (in Russian)
- Algasin A.I., Demin V.F., Gordeev K.I., Loborev V.M., Kiselev V.I., Shoikhet Ya.N. Radiation impact of nuclear weapon tests at the Semipalatinsk test on the population of the Altai region. In: The Proceedings of the IAEA Symposium on Environmental Impact of Radioactive Releases. Vienna, Austria; 1995: 435–47.
- Solov’ev V.Yu. The concept of allocation of high-risk groups among facilities’ personnel with hazardous working conditions. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2013; (3): 27–33. (in Russian)
- Demin V.F. On use of risk analysis to assess the damage to personnel and the population and the decision on insurance and compensation for damage. In: Seminar “On the Practice of Insurance of Nuclear and Radiation Risk” [Seminar po praktike strakhovaniya yadernogo i radiatsionnogo riskov]. Moscow: Gosatomnadzor of Russia; 2001: 11–9. (in Russian)
- Legasov V.A., Demin V.F., Shevelev Ya.V. Discounting and compromise between the generations. Problemy analiza riska. 2005; 2 (2): 141–6. (in Russian)
- Kaprin A.D., Starinskiy V.V., eds. Malignancies in Russia. Review of Statistical Information for 1993–2013 Years [Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii. Obzor statisticheskoy informatsii za 1993–2013 gg]. Moscow: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena; 2015. (in Russian)
- R 2.1.10.1920-04. Guidelines for risk assessment to public health under the influence of chemicals that polluted the environment. The Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare. Moscow; 2004. (in Russian)
补充文件
