Occupational health care in regions with different levels of occupational morbidity in agricultural workers
- Authors: Bezrukova G.A.1, Mikerov A.N.1, Spirin V.F.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saratov Hygiene Medical Research Center “Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies”
- Issue: Vol 100, No 5 (2021)
- Pages: 444-450
- Section: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
- Published: 07.06.2021
- URL: https://rjraap.com/0016-9900/article/view/639257
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-5-444-450
- ID: 639257
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. In recent years, special attention has been paid to the discrepancy between working conditions in different sectors of the Russian economy and the inadequately low level of registered occupational morbidity (OM). At the same time, as a rule, issues of access to occupational health care that are important for the rural population are not considered due to the lower potential of socio-economic and infrastructural development of rural areas compared to the city.
Material and methods. The paper uses updated data on 82 subjects of the Russian Federation on working conditions, the level of OM of agricultural workers, and indicators of occupational health care for the rural population in 2011–2017.
Results. The ranking of subjects of the Russian Federation by the level of non-infectious occupational morbidity of agricultural workers was carried out: group I (OM above the national average), group II (OM below the national average), group III (OM is not registered). It is shown that non-detection of occupational diseases in the regions of group III could be due to insufficient provision of rural health care by occupational pathologists (54.2%), low coverage of workers with periodic medical examinations (PME) (76.6%), as well as the absence of occupational health centers (OPC) in 5 territories. of the 18 regions. According to the criteria of availability of occupational pathologists (97.5%) and coverage of PME (95.5%), the highest availability of primary occupational pathology care occurred in the regions of group II. However, the high proportion of occupational diseases identified during self-treatment indicated a formal approach to conducting PME in this group. The most accessible specialized occupational health care was typical for the subjects of the Russian Federation of group I with a high level of OМ, on the territory of which the most significant number of OPC functioned with the possibility of extended pre-examination of employees with suspected occupational diseases in a hospital.
Conclusion. Along with harmful working conditions, the occupational morbidity of agricultural workers is primarily determined by the availability of specialized occupational health care, namely, occupational health centers’ availability, equipment, and capacity.
About the authors
Galina A. Bezrukova
Saratov Hygiene Medical Research Center “Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies”
Author for correspondence.
Email: bezrukovagala@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9296-0233
MD, Ph.D., DSci., chief researcher of Department of occupational medicine Saratov Hygiene Medical Research Center of the Federal Research Center "Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies", Saratov, 410022, Russian Federation.
e-mail: bezrukovagala@yandex.ru
Russian FederationAnatoly N. Mikerov
Saratov Hygiene Medical Research Center “Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies”
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0670-7918
Russian Federation
Vladimir F. Spirin
Saratov Hygiene Medical Research Center “Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies”
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2987-0099
Russian Federation
References
- Resolution XIV of the Russian national Congress with international participation «Profession and Health» and VI all-Russian Congress of occupational physicians. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2017; (11): 1–7. (in Russian)
- Popova A.Yu. Working conditions and occupational morbidity in the Russian Federation. Meditsina truda i ekologiya cheloveka. 2015; (3): 7–13. (in Russian)
- Bukhtiyarov I.V. National system of registration of occupational diseases taking into account features of the Russian Federation. Available at: https://docplayer.ru/50683400-Nacionalnaya-sistema-registracii-professionalnyh-zabolevaniy-s-uchyotom-osobennostey-rossiyskoy-federacii.html (in Russian)
- Boyko I.V. The impact of the socio-economic situation on the official registration of occupational diseases in the Russian Federation. In: Materials of the Scientific and Practical Conference «Actual Issues of Occupational Medicine in the North-Western Federal District» [Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Aktual’nye voprosy meditsiny truda v Severo-Zapadnom federal’nom okruge»]. St. Petersburg; 2018: 17–21. (in Russian)
- Khoruzhaya O.G., Piktushanskaya T.E., Gorblyanskiy Yu.Yu. Evaluation of workers’ periodic medical examinations quality. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2015; (12): 41–4. (in Russian)
- Ulumbekova G.E. Healthcare of Russia: 2018–2024. What to do? ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VShOUZ. 2018; (1): 9–16. (in Russian)
- Kleymenov M.V. Medical care in rural areas: problems and contradictions. Azimut nauchnykh issledovaniy: pedagogika i psikhologiya. 2017; 6(1): 341–4. (in Russian)
- Danilov A.N., Bezrukova G.A., Spirin V.F. Modern aspects of professional pathological care to agricultural workers. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2019; (6): 19–26. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2019-315-6-19-26 (in Russian)
- Results of the all-Russian agricultural census of 2016. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/519 (in Russian)
- State of working conditions of employees of organizations for certain types of economic activity in the Russian Federation. Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/compendium/document/13264 (in Russian)
- Radionova G.K., Piktushanskaya I.N., Karacharova S.V., Zhavoronok L.G. Organizational, Functional and Informational Basis of Activity of Territorial Centers of Occupational Pathology [Organizatsionno-funktsional’naya i informatsionnaya osnova deyatel’nosti territorial’nykh tsentrov profpatologii]. Rostov-na-Donu: Poligrafist; 2007. (in Russian)
- Gudinova Zh.V., Zhernakova G.N. Professional morbidity in Russia: regional variations and causes. Sotsial’nye aspekty zdorov’ya naseleniya. 2011; (1): 9. Available at: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/263/30. (in Russian)
- Fedorovich G.V. Occupational safety based on the federal law on control and supervisory activities. Bezopasnost’ i okhrana truda. 2020; (3): 5–15. (in Russian)
- Popova A.Yu., Zaytseva N.V., May I.V., Kir’yanov D.A. On the development of the system of risk-based supervision in the field of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population and consumer protection. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2015; (4): 4–12. (in Russian)
- Popova A.Yu. Issues and trends in occupational morbidity of agricultural workers of the Russian Federation. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2016; (9): 4–9. (in Russian)
- Ignatova E.N., Andreeva E.E., Simonova N.I., Nizyaeva I.V. Place of production control in occupational risk management system. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2014; (9): 27–31. (in Russian)
- Babanov S.A., Budash D.S., Baykova A.G., Baraeva R.A. Periodic medical examinations and occupational selection in industrial medicine. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya. 2018; (5): 48–53. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2018-302-5-48-53 (in Russian)
- Fadeev G.A., Garipova R.V., Arkhipov E.V., Mikhoparova O.Yu., Berkheeva Z.M., Oshchepkova O.B., et al. The role of routine medical examinationsin occupational and corporal disease prevention. Vestnik sovremennoy klinicheskoy meditsiny. 2019; 12(4): 99–105. https://doi.org/10.20969/VSKM.2019.12(4).99-105 (in Russian)
- Bukhtiyarov I.V. Main results and prospects of development and improvement of occupational pathology services in Russia. Available at: https://congress.oh-events.ru/doc/arch/2015_NPK-IVBukhtiiarov.pdf (in Russian)
Supplementary files
