<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1993-6508</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2687-1394</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">42874</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/RA42874</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">EXPERIENCE OF THE USE OF LEVOBUPIVACAINE FOR SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN UROLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ОПЫТ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ ЛЕВОБУПИВАКАИНАДЛЯ СПИНАЛЬНОЙ АНЕСТЕЗИИПРИ УРОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ВМЕШАТЕЛЬСТВАХ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Garyaev</surname><given-names>Roman V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Гаряев</surname><given-names>Роман Владимирович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, PhD, DSc, senior researcher of the department of anesthesiology, N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, 115478, Moscow, Russian Federation</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор медицинских наук, старший научный сотрудник отделения анестезиологии-реанимации ФГБУ ««Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н.Н. Блохина» Минздрава России, 115478, Москва</p></bio><email>romvga@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Gruzdev</surname><given-names>V. E</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Груздев</surname><given-names>В. Е</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rychkov</surname><given-names>I. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рычков</surname><given-names>И. А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБУ «Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр онкологии им. Н.Н. Блохина» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2018-03-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>03</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 12, NO1 (2018)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 12, №1 (2018)</issue-title><fpage>30</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-08-24"><day>24</day><month>08</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2018, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2018, ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/42874">https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/42874</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The prospective study included data obtained during the surgical treatment of 55 urological patients. In the X10 group (n = 25) for spinal anesthesia used 2 ml of a 0.5% isobaric solution of levobupivacaine (10 mg), in the X15 group (n = 30) - 3 ml of a similar solution (15 mg). Results. The time to the motor blockade of Bromage I in the study groups was 9 ± 3 min versus 8 ± 3 min, p = 0.154, to Bromage III - 18 ± 7 min versus 13 ± 3 min, p = 0.001. In group X10 motor blockade did not develop in 1, reached only the first degree - in 1, only the second degree - in 5 patients. In the X15 group, all patients underwent motor blockade of the third degree, except for 2 patients, in whom block reached only the second degree. The maximum level of sensory blockade in the group X10 was Th8, X15 - Th9. In the X10 group, the upper blockade level, not exceeding Th11, was observed in 11 (44%), and in the X15 group - in 17 (57%) patients. In 6 cases of the X10 group (24%) and 5 cases of the X15 group (17%) had to add sedation or general anesthesia. The duration of motor blockade before the beginning of recovery was 163 ± 57 min versus 195 ± 66 min, p = 0.076, until the motor block regressed completely - 219 ± 66 min versus 290 ± 90 min, p = 0.002. Arterial hypotension was observed in one patient group X10 (4%) and 0 group X15, bradycardia in 7 (28%) and 7 (23%) patients, respectively. There were no transient neurologic symptoms in any cases. Conclusions. Spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine was characterized by a slow development of the complete motor block, unpredictably low upper level of the sensory blockade and a long-lasting motor block. It can be used in patients with high risk of arterial hypotension or transient neurologic symptoms, provided sufficient time is available before the operation, the possibility of sedation and / or the addition of general anesthesia.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В проспективное исследование включены данные, полученные при хирургическом лечении 55 онкоурологических больных. В группе Х10 (n=25) интратекально вводили 2 мл 0,5% изобарического раствора левобупивакаина (10 мг), в группе Х15 (n = 30) - 3 мл аналогичного раствора (15 мг). Результаты. Время до моторной блокады Bromage I в группах исследования составило 9 ± 3 и 8 ± 3 мин, р = 0,154, до Bromage III - 18 ± 7 и 13 ± 3 мин, р = 0,001. В группе Х10 моторная блокада не развилась у 1, достигла только первой степени - у 1, только второй степени - у 5 больных. В группе Х15 у всех пациентов наступила моторная блокада третьей степени, за исключением 2 больных, у которых она достигла только второй степени. Максимальный уровень сенсорной блокады в группе Х10 - Th8, Х15 - Th9. В группе Х10 верхний уровень блокады, не превышающий Th11, наблюдался у 11 (44%), а в группе Х15 - у 17 (57%) больных. В 6 случаях группы Х10 (24%) и 5 случаях группы Х15 (17%) пришлось добавлять седацию или общую анестезию. Продолжительность моторной блокады до начала восстановления движений составила 163 ± 57 и 195 ± 66 мин, p = 0,076, до полной регрессии моторного блока - 219 ± 66 и 290 ± 90 мин, р = 0,002. Артериальная гипотензия отмечалась у одного больного группы Х10 (4%) и 0 группы Х15, синусовая брадикардия - у 7 (28%) и 7 (23%) пациентов соответственно. Транзиторной неврологической симптоматики не было ни в одном наблюдении. Заключение. Спинальная анестезия изобарическим левобупивакаином отличалась медленным развитием полного моторного блока, непредсказуемо низким верхним уровнем сенсорной блокады и длительно сохраняющимся моторным блоком. Она может найти применение у пациентов с высоким риском развития артериальной гипотензии или транзиторного неврологического синдрома при условии достаточного запаса времени перед началом операции, возможности проведения седации и/или добавления общей анестезии.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>levobupivacaine</kwd><kwd>spinal anesthesia</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>левобупивакаин</kwd><kwd>спинальная анестезия</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Bajwa S.J.S., Kaur J. Clinical profile of levobupivacaine in regional anesthesia: A systematic review. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013; 29(4): 530-539.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Burlacu C.L., Buggy D.J. Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2008; 4(2): 381-392.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Sell A., Olkkola K.T., Jalonen J., Aantaa R. Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose of isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered via a spinal catheter for hip replacement surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 2005; 94(2): 239-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Parpaglioni R., Frigo M.G., Lemma A., Sebastiani M., Barbati G., Celleno D. Minimum local anaesthetic dose (MLAD) of intrathecal levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for Caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2006; 61(2):110-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Baydilek Y., Yurtlu B.S., Hanci V., Ayoğlu H., Okyay R.D., Kayhan G.E. et al. The comparison of levobupivacaine in continuous or single dose spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection of prostate surgery. Braz. J. Anesthesiol. 2014; 64(2): 89-97.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Attri J.P., Kaur G., Kaur S., Kaur R., Mohan B., Kashyap K. Comparison of levobupivacaine and levobupivacaine with fentanyl in infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. Anesth. Essays Res. 2015; 9(2): 178-184.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Vanna O., Chumsang L., Thongmee S. Levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for transurethral endoscopic surgery. J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2006; 89(8): 1133-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Del-Rio-Vellosillo M., Garcia-Medina J.J., Abengochea-Cotaina A., Pinazo-Duran M.D., Barbera-Alacreu M. Spinal Anesthesia for Knee Arthroscopy Using Isobaric Bupivacaine and Levobupivacaine: Anesthetic and Neuroophthalmological Assessment. BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 349034, 7 pages, 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/349034.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Sanansilp V., Trvate T., Chompubai P., Visalyaputra S., Suksopee P., Permpolprasert L. et al. Clinical characteristics of spinal levobupivacaine: hyperbaric compared with isobaric solution. Scientific World Journal. 2012; 2012:169076. doi: 10.1100/2012/169076. Epub 2012 Apr. 24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Lee Y.Y., Muchhal K., Chan C.K. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth. Intensive Care. 2003; 31(6): 637-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Gulec D., Karsli B., Ertugrul F., Bigat Z., Kayacan N. Intrathecal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine: which should be used for elderly patients? J. Int. Med. Res. 2014; 42(2): 376-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Jindal R., Gupta M. Comparison of isobaric Ropivacaine and Levobupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anesthesia. International Journal of Scientific Research and Education. 2016; 4(5): 5288-5293.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Burke D., Kennedy S., Bannister J. Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% S(-)-bupivacaine for elective lower limb surgery. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 1999; 24(6): 519-23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Glaser C., Marhofer P., Zimpfer G., Heinz M.T., Sitzwohl C., Kapral S. et al. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth. Analg. 2002; 94(1): 194-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Whiteside J.B., Wildsmith J.A.W. Spinal anaesthesia: an update. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care &amp; Pain. 2005; 5(2): 37-40.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>McLeod G.A., Burke D. Levobupivacaine. Anaesthesia. 2001; 56: 331-341.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Cuvas O., Basar H., Yeygel A., Turkyilmaz E., Sunay M.M. Spinal anesthesia for transurethral resection operations: levobupivacaine with or without fentanyl. Middle East J. Anaesthesiol. 2010; 20(4): 547-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Fattorini F., Ricci Z., Rocco A., Romano R., Pascarella M.A., Pinto G. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in orthopaedic major surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006; 72(7-8): 637-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Singh G., Kelkar V., Kulkarni S., Nayak P., Udiavar A., Warkari T. Comprison of isobaric levobupivacaine 0.5% and isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% for spinal anaesthesia in lower limb surgeries. World Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research. 2017; 3(1): 448-453.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Mann A., Harper I., Brock S. Levobupivacaine for low-dose spinal anaesthesia. BJA. 2014; 112(2): 380.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Naithani U., Malleshappa K., Pramod M. Comparison of Intrathecal Isobaric Levobupivacaine with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb. Orthopedic Surgeries. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research IJHSR. 2015; 5(10): 73-84.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Mohan S., Saran J., Kashyap M. Comparative Study of 0.5% Levobupivacaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine with Fentanyl in Transurethral Resection of Prostate. International Journal of Scientific Study. 2017; 4(10): 67-72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Ertugrul F., Bigat Z., Kayacan N., Karsli B. An unusually prolonged duration of spinal anaesthesia following 0.5% Levobupivacaine. J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2012; 62(11): 1235-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Lee Y.Y., Muchhal K., Chan C.K., Cheung A.S. Levobupivacaine and fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2005; 22(12): 899-903.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Erbay H.R., Ermumcu O., Hanci V., Atalay H. A comparison of spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for transurethral surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010; 76(12): 992-1001.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Maniyar F., Trishala J., Praveen K.O. Spinal Anesthesia for Transurethral Resection of Prostate: Levobupivacaine with or without Fentanyl. Int. J. Anesth. Res. 2016; 4(11): 358-362.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Casati A., Moizo E., Marchetti C., Vinciguerra F. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of unilateral spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivacaine for inguinal herniorrhaphy. Anesth. Analg. 2004; 99(5): 1387-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Alley E.A., Kopacz D.J., McDonald S.B., Liu S.S. Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine: a comparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesth. Analg. 2002; 94(1): 188-93.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Zaric D., Pace N.L. Transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anaesthetics (Review) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD003006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Gozdemir M., Muslu B., Sert H., Usta B., Demircioglu R.I., Kasikara H. Transient neurological symptoms after spinal anesthesia. Clin. Invest. Med. 2016; 39(6): 106-110.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
