Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain ManagementRegional Anesthesia and Acute Pain ManagementРегионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли1993-65082687-1394Eco-Vector3619610.17816/RA36196ArticlesСтатьиResearch ArticleChoosing of optimal spinal needle as one of the conditions for safety of spinal anesthesia (literature review)Выбор оптимальной спинальной иглы как одно из условий безопасности спинальной анестезии (Обзор литературы)OvechkinA. MОвечкинА. МSBEI “Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University’, 119991, MoscowГБОУ ВПО «Первый московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова», 119991, Москва1503201481VOL 8, NO1 (2014)ТОМ 8, №1 (2014)51321072020Copyright ©; 2014, Eco-VectorCopyright ©; 2014, ООО "Эко-Вектор"2014Eco-VectorООО "Эко-Вектор"https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/36196

The wide using of spinal anesthesia that is technically uncomplicated and highly effective technique makes strict demands to its safety, minimizing of complications and side effects that it is not devoid of unfortunately. In present review the author summarizes data from special literature dedicated to importance of choosing the needle of this or that type in terms of safety and efficiency of SA as well as safety of diagnostic lumbar puncture.

Широкое применение спинальной анестезии, технически несложной и высокоэффективной методики анестезии, предъявляет высокие требования к ее безопасности, минимизации осложнений и побочных эффектов, которых она, увы, не лишена. В данном обзоре суммируются литературные данные о значении выбора спинальной иглы того или иного типа с точки зрения обеспечения безопасности и эффективности СА, а также безопасности диагностической люмбальной пункции.

spinal anesthesiaspinal needlesafety of spinal anesthesiaспинальная анестезиявыбор спинальной иглыбезопасность спинальной анестезииHarrington B. Postdural puncture headache and the development of epidural blood patch. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med., 2004; 29: 136-163.Benzon H., Nemickas R., Molloy R. Lumbar and thoracic epidural blood injections for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Anesthesiology. 1996; 85: 920-922.Evans R., Armon C., Frohman E., Goodin D. Assessment: Prevention of post - lumbar puncture headaches: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2000; 55: 909914.Lambert D., Harley R., Hertwig L. Role of needle gauge and tip configuration in the production of lumbar puncture headache. Reg. Anesth. 1997; 22: 66-72.Vallejo M., Mandell G., Sabo D., Ramanathan S. Postdural puncture headache: a randomized comparison of five spinal needles in obstetric patients. Anesth. Analg., 2000; 91: 916920Braune H., Huffmann G. A prospective double-blind clinical trial, comparing the sharp Quincke needle (22 G) with an «atraumatic» needle (22 G) in the induction of post-lumbar puncture headache. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1992; 86: 50-54.Muller B., Adelt K., Reichmann H., Toyka K. Atraumatic needle reduces the incidence of post-lumbar puncture syndrome. J. Neurol., 1994; 241: 376-380.Strupp M., Schueler O., Straube A. Atraumatic Sprotte needle reduces the incidence of post-lumbar puncture headaches. Neurology., 2001; 57: 2310-2312.Halpern S., Preston R. Postdural puncture headache and spinal needle design. Metaanalyses. Anesthesiology. 1994; 81: 13761383.Sharma S., Gampling D., Joshi G. Comparison of 26-gauge Atraucan and 25-gauge Whitacre needles: insertion characteristics and complications. Can. J. Anaesth 1995; 42: 706-710.Mihic D. Postspinal headache and relationship of the needle bevel to longitudinal dural fibers. Reg.Anesth., 1985; 10: 76-79.Tarkkila P., Heine H., Tervo R. Comparison of Sprotte and Quincke needles with respect to post dural puncture headache and backache. Reg. Anesth. 1992; 17: 283-287.Kang S., Goodnough D., Lee Y. Comparison of 26- and 27-G needles for spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery patients. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76: 734-738.Mayer D., Quance D., Weeks S. Headache after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of the 27-gauge Quincke and 24-gauge Sprotte needles. Anesth Analg. 1992; 75: 377380.Strupp M., Brandt T., Muller A. Incidence of post-lumbar puncture syndrome reduced by reinserting the stylet: a randomized prospective study of 600 patients. J. Neurol. 1998; 245: 589-592. Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли Том VIII №1 2014Kuntz K., Kokmen E., Stevens J. Post-lumbar puncture headaches: experience in 501 consecutive procedures. Neurology. 1992; 42: 1884-1887.Iqbal J., Davis L., Orrison W. An MRI study of lumbar puncture headaches. Headache. 1995; 35: 420-422.Cook P., Davies M., Beavis R. Bed rest and postlumbar puncture headache. The effectiveness of 24-hours recumbency in reducing the incidence of postlumbar puncture headache. Anaesthesia. 1989; 44: 389-391.Spriggs D., Burn D., French J. Is bed rest useful after diagnostic lumbar puncture? Postgrad.Med.J. 1992; 68: 581-583.Dieterich M., Brandt T. Incidence of post-lumbar puncture headache is independent of daily fluid intake. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry. 1988; 237: 194-196.Schultz A., Ulbing S., Kaider A., Lehofer F. Postdural puncture headache and back pain after spinal anesthesia with 27-gauge Quincke and 26-gauge Atraucan needles. Reg Anesth. 1996; 21: 461-464.Buettner J., Wresch K., Klose R. Postdural puncture headache: comparison of 25-gauge Whitacre and Quincke needles. Reg. Anesth. 1993; 18: 166-169.Devcic A., Sprung J., Patel S. PDPH in obstetric anesthesia: comparison of 24-gauge Sprotte and 25-gauge Quincke needles and effect of subarachnoid administration of fentanyl. Reg. Anesth. 1993; 18: 222-225.Prager J., Roychowdhury S., Gorey M. Spinal headaches after myelograms: comparison of needle types. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1996; 167: 1289-1292.Jensen K., Jensen L., Felding M. Complications after spinal analgesia using three different spinal needles: Sprotte, Atraucan and Spinocan. Ugeskr. Laeger. 1999; 161: 6775-6778.Reina M., Andres L., Maches F. Electronic microscope and expansion of region anesthesia knowledge. Techniques in Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2002; 6: 165-171.Reina M., De Andres J., Maches F., Lopez A. Iatrogenic spinal epidermoid tumors. Highlights in regional anaesthesia and pain management. XVI., 2007, Valencia, Spain: 134-149.Reina M., de Leon-Casasola O., Lopez A. An in vitro study of dural lesions produced by 25-gauge Quincke and Whitacre needles evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Reg. An-esth. Pain Med. 2000; 25: 393-396.Arendt K., Demaerschalk B., Wingerchuk D., Camann W. Atraumatic lumbar puncture needles. After all these years, are we still missing the point? Neurologist. 2009; 15: 17-20.Fog J., Wang L., Sundberg A. Hearing loss after spinal anesthesia is related to needle size. Anesth. Analg. 1990; 70: 517-522.Sundberg A., Wang L., Fog J. Influence of hearing of 22G Whitacre and 22G Quincke needles. Anaesthesia. 1992; 41: 981-983.Lumbar puncture and epidermoid tumours (editorial). Lancet, 1977; 19; 1 (8012): 635.Puolakka R., Andersson L., Rosenberg P. Microscopic analysis of three different spinal needle tips after experimental subarachnoid puncture. Reg.Anesth.Pain Med. 2000; 25: 163-169.Brandus V. The spinal needle as a carrier of foreign material. Can. J. Anaesth. 1968; 15: 197-201.Puolakka R., Jokinen M., Pitkanen M., Rosenberg P. Comparison of postanesthetic sequelae after clinical use of 27-gauge cutting and noncutting spinal needles. Reg. Anestn. 1997; 22: 521-526.Parker R., White P. A microscopic analysis of cut-bevel versus pencil-point spinal needles. Anesth. Analg. 1997; 85:1101-1104.Currier D., Bevasqua B. Sprotte spinal needle: a new design. Reg. Anesth. 1996; 21: 172-173.