<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1993-6508</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2687-1394</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">36183</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/RA36183</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The variations of postoperative analgesia for cesarean section. What to choose?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Варианты послеоперационной анальгезии при кесаревом сечении. Что выбрать?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zabolotskiy</surname><given-names>D. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Заболотский</surname><given-names>Д. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Ryazanova</surname><given-names>O. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рязанова</surname><given-names>О. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Mamsurov</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мамсуров</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Alexandrovich</surname><given-names>Yu. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Александрович</surname><given-names>Ю. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Malashenko</surname><given-names>N. S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Малашенко</surname><given-names>Н. С.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Saint-Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ГБОУ ВПО «Санкт-Петербургский государственный педиатрический медицинский университет»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2013-09-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>09</month><year>2013</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL VII, NO3 (2013)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 7, №3 (2013)</issue-title><fpage>16</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-07-21"><day>21</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2013, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2013, ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2013</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2020-10-01"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/36183">https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/36183</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Inadequate analgesia after operation is one of the reasons of complications in the early postoperative period. In obstetrics this problem gains also social character: early activation for care and feeding newborn is very important for woman. The goal of the study was to assess adequacy of pain management in women after Cesarean Section. The study included 139 patients. All of them were undergone the operation under spinal anesthesia. Two methods of analgesia were compared in early postoperative period and the patients were randomized into two groups for this purpose. The first group received combination of ketoprofene with the transversus abdominal plane block (TAP) and the other group received standard options of analgesia (ketoprofene+promedol). The study results showed that efficiency of analgesia in TAB-block group was higher that was confirmed by assessment made with rating verbal scales of pain. Opioid and non-steroid drugs consumption was much higher In standard analgesia group. The level of a cortisol and prolactinum was lower in patients from TAB-block group. Early activation was also registered in patients of this group. Hence, combination of the TAB-block with non-steroid agents provides high level of an analgesia, increases patient's comfort, and allows providing full care of babies starting from the first days after operation.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Неадекватное обезболивание после операции - одна из причин осложнений раннего послеоперационного периода. В акушерстве данная проблема приобретает так же и социальный характер: важна ранняя активизация женщины для обеспечения ухода и вскармливания новорожденного. Цель нашего исследования заключалась в оценке адекватности терапии болевого синдрома у женщин после операции кесарево сечение. В исследование были включены 139 женщин, которым проводили родоразрешение под спинальной анестезией. В раннем послеоперационном периоде мы сравнивали эффективность анальгезии у женщин, которым комбинировали кетопрофен с блокадой поперечного пространства живота (БППЖ) и рожениц со стандартными вариантами обезболивания (промедол + кетопрофен). Результаты исследования показали эффективность анальгезии в группе, где использовалась БППЖ, подтвержденная цифровыми вербальными шкалами. В группе, где БППЖ не выполняли, женщинам требовались значимо большие дозы НПВС и дополнительное введение наркотических анальгетиков. Уровень кортизола и пролактина был ниже у пациенток с регионарной блокадой. Так же отмечена ранняя активация больных данной группы. Таким образом, комбинация БППЖ с НПВС обеспечивает высокий уровень анальгезии, повышает комфорт пациентов и позволяет обеспечивать полноценный уход за младенцами уже с первых сут после операции.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>tranverse abdominal plane block</kwd><kwd>obstetrics</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>блокада поперечного пространства живота (БППЖ)</kwd><kwd>акушерство</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>МакДоннелл Дж., О'Доннелл Б., Керли Дж., Хеффернан А., Пауэр К., Лаффи Дж. Анальгетическая эффективность поперечного абдоминального плоскостного блока после абдоминальных операций: проспективное рандомизированное контролируемое исследование // Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. 2010; 3: 27-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Свирский Д. А. Автореферат на соискание степени кандидата медицинских наук. Эффективность послеоперационной анальгезии методом блокады нервов нейрофасциального пространства живота при кесаревом сечении. Москва. 2012. 20 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Baaj J. M., Alsatli R. A., Majaj H. A., Babay Z.A., Thallaj A. K. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for post cesarean section delivery analgesia-a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study // Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2010; 20: 821-826.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Belavy D., Cowlishaw P. J., Howes M., Phillips F Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after caesarean delivery // Br. J. Anaesth. 2009; 103: 726-730.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Charlton S., Cyna A. M., Middleton P and Griffiths J. D., “Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 8, Article ID CD007705, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Dierking G. W., Dahl J. B., Kanstrup J., et al. Effect of pre- vs postoperative inguinal field block on postoperative pain after herniorrhaphy // Br. J. Anaesth. 1992; 68: 344-348.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>El-Dawlatly A. A., Turkistani A., Kettner S. C., Machata A. M., Delvi M. B., Thallaj A., Kapral S., Marhofer P Ultrasoundguided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy // Br. J. Anaesth. 2009; 102: 763-767.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Eslamian L., Jalili Z., Jamal A., Marsoosi V., Movafegh A. Trans-versus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anesthesia // J. Anesth. 2012.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Griffiths J. D., Middle J. V., Barron F. A., Grant S. J., Popham P A. and Royse C. F. “Transversus abdominis plane block does not provide additional benefit to multimodal analgesia in gynecological cancer surgery // Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2010; 111 (3): 797-801.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Hebbard P Subcostal transversus abdominis plane block under ultrasound guidance // Anesth. Analg. 2008; 106: 674-675.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Kanazi G. E., Aouad M. T., Abdallah F W. et al. The analgesic efficacy of subarachnoid morphine in comparison with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial // Anesth. Analg. 2010; 111: 475-481.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Kuppuvelumani P., Jaradi H., Delilkan A. Abdominal nerve blockade for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section. Asia Oceania // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1993; 19: 165-169.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>McCaffery M. Pain: Clinical manual for nursing practice/ M. McCaffery, A. Beebe, J. Leetham (Ed) - Baltimore: V. V. Mosby Company. 1994. P. 320.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>McDonnell N. J., Keating M. L., Muchatuta N. A., Pavy T. J., Paech M. J. Analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009; 37: 539-551.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>McMorrow R. C., Ni Mhuircheartaigh R. J., Ahmed K. A., et al. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal. morphine for pain relief after caesarean section // Br. J. Anaesth. 2011; 106: 706-712.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>O’Donnell B.D, McDonnell J.G, McShane A.J. The transverses abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy // Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2006; 31: 91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Ohnhaus E. E. Methodological problem in the measurement of pain a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale / E.E. Ohnhaus, R. Adler // Pain. 1975; 1: 379.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Rafi A. N. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle // Anaesthesia. 2001; 56: 1024-1026.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Wall P D., Melzack R. Pain measurements in persons in pain. In: Wall P.D., Melzack R., eds. Textbook of pain. 4th ed. Edinburgh, UK // Churchill Livingstone. 1999; 409-426.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
