Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain ManagementRegional Anesthesia and Acute Pain ManagementРегионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли1993-65082687-1394Eco-Vector3607210.17816/RA36072ArticlesСтатьиResearch ArticleThe analysis of failures during performing of regional anesthesia under ultrasound controlАнализ неудач при выполнении проводниковой анестезии под ультразвуковым контролемTarasyukA. V.ТарасюкА. В.ButkoI. I.БутькоИ. И.TarasyukE. V.ТарасюкЕ. В.Emergency Hospital, Regional Clinical Hospital, GomelБСМП, Областная клиническая больница, г. Гомель1512201044VOL 4, NO4 (2010)ТОМ 4, №4 (2010)172121072020Copyright ©; 2010, Eco-VectorCopyright ©; 2010, ООО "Эко-Вектор"2010Eco-VectorООО "Эко-Вектор"https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/36072

Results of the research, which purpose was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of conductive anesthesia under ultrasound control in comparison with traditional method (nerve search with paresthesias) and assessment of the key points, which influence the effectiveness of this method, are presented. Authors made a conclusion that the reasons of 50% of failures are mistakes that associated with anesthesiologist's experience.

Представлены результаты исследования, целью которого была оценка безопасности и эффективности проводниковой анестезии под УЗ-контролем по сравнению с традиционной методикой (поиск нервов по парестезиям), а также определение ключевых моментов, влияющих на эффективность выполнения данной методики. Авторы работы пришли к выводу, что в структуре причин неудач проводниковой анестезии до 50% занимают ошибки, связанные с опытом анестезиолога.

ultrasound visualizationconductive anesthesiaультразвуковая визуализацияпроводниковая анестезияAuroy Y., Benhamou D., Bargues L. et al. Major complications of regional anesthesia in France: The SOS Regional // Anesthesia Hotline Service. 2002; 97: 1274-1280.Editorial. Ultrasound imaging by anaesthetists: training and accreditation issues. Bodenham A. R. // British Journal of Anaesthesia, April 2006; 96 (4): 414-417.Ban C. H. Tsui, Derek Dillane. Continuing medical education: Ultrasound guidance for regional blockade - basic concepts // Can. J. Anesth. 2008; 869-874.Edited by Philip M. Hopkins, Andrew R. Bodenham, Scott T. Reeves. Practical Ultrasound in Anesthesia for Critical Care and Pain Management. New York : Informa Healthcare, 2008.Министерство здравоохранения Республики Беларусь. Контроль качества в лучевой диагностике. Минск : б.н., 2006.Gray, Andrew T. Ultrasound-guided Regional Anesthesia // Current State of the Art anesthesiology. 2006; 104: 368373.Perlas A., Lobo G., Lo N. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: outcome of 510 consecutive cases // Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2009, Mar-Apr; 34 (2): 171-176.Bigeleisen P., Wilson M. A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound guided infraclavicular block // British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2006; 96 (4): 502-507.Dingemans E., Williams S. R., Arcand G. Neurostimulation in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: a prospective randomized trial // Anesth. Analg. May 2007. 1275-1280.Brian D. Sites, Michael L. Beach. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: limitations of a powerful technology. The ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology, 2008, 167-177.Alexander Levitov, Paul H. Mayo, Anthony D. Slonim. Critical Care Ultrasonography. NewYork United States : McGraw-Hill Professional, 2009.Yamada M., Seo N. Basics of ultrasound-guided nerve block. 2008 May; 57 (5), Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology, p. 549-555.Vicki E. Noble, Bret Nelson, A. Nicholas Sutingco. Manual of Emergency and Critical Care Ultrasound. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007.Sites B. D., Brull R., Chan V. W. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part II: a pictorial approach to understanding and avoidance // Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2007 Sep-Oct; 32 (5): 419-433.Sites B. D., Brull R., Chan V. W. Artifacts and pitfall errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part I: understanding the basic principles of ultrasound physics and machine operations // Reg. Anesth. Pain. Med. 2007 Sep-Oct; 32 (5): 412-418.Andrew T. Gray. “Bayonet Artifact” during Ultrasound-guided Transarterial AxillaryBlock // Anesthesiology. 2005; 1291-1292.Saranteas T., Karabinis A. Reverberation: source of potential artifacts occurring during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia // Can. J. Anaesth. 2009 Feb; 56 (2): 174-175.Marhofer P., Harrop-Griffiths W., Willschke H. and Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: Part 2- Recent developments in block techniques // British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010; 673-683.Maecken T., Zenz M., Grau T. Ultrasound characteristic of needles for regional anesthesia // Reg. Anesth. Pain Med. 2007; 440-447.Terese T. Horlocker, Denise J. Wedel. Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia: In Search of the Holy Grail / / Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2007, May; 104: 1009-1011.Marhofer P., Harrop-Griffiths W., Kettner S. C. and Kirchmair L. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: Part 1 // British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2010; 538-546.