<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1993-6508</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2687-1394</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">107978</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/RA107978</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original study articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные исследования</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Comparative evaluation of the use of femoral nerve block and adductor canal as a component of early patient activation after knee arthroplasty</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Сравнительная оценка использования блокады бедренного нерва и блокады приводящего канала как компонента ранней активизации пациентов после эндопротезирования коленного сустава</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-7163</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4067-1787</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Krylov</surname><given-names>Sergey V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Крылов</surname><given-names>Сергей Валерьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н.</p></bio><email>doc087@inbox.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-4160</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">4433-1418</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pasechnik</surname><given-names>Igor N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пасечник</surname><given-names>Игорь Николаевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.м.н., профессор</p></bio><email>pasigor@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorova</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Central State Medical Academy of the Administrative Department of the President of the Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Центральная государственная медицинская академия Управления делами Президента РФ</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-09-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>257</fpage><lpage>265</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2022-05-17"><day>17</day><month>05</month><year>2022</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2021, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2021, ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-holder></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/107978">https://rjraap.com/1993-6508/article/view/107978</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold><italic>BACKGROUND</italic></bold><italic>:</italic> The number of surgical interventions for the knee joint increases annually due the increase in the total number of patients and the improvement of operation techniques. The provision of modern anesthesiology and intensive care is associated with a positive treatment outcome, which is based on adequate pain relief in the perioperative period, suppressed complications, and reduction in hospital stay. Regional analgesia is a modern and effective method of pain relief after knee surgery. However, the location of peripheral blockade may affect the timing of activation and rehabilitation in these patients.</p> <p><bold><italic>AIM</italic></bold><italic>:</italic> This study aimed to evaluate the use of femoral nerve and adductor canal blockade in the framework of the accelerated recovery program after knee arthroplasty.</p> <p><bold><italic>MATERIALS AND METHODS</italic></bold><italic>:</italic> A prospective, randomized, single-center study included 80 patients who underwent primary knee arthroplasty and were randomly assigned to two clinical groups. Group 1 (n=40) included patients who underwent femoral nerve blockade in the postoperative period, and group 2 (n=40) included patients who underwent adductor canal blockade in the postoperative period. In the postoperative period, the level of pain at rest and during movement was analyzed using a visual analog pain level scale after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours. The amount of prescribed narcotic analgesic in the postoperative period was recorded, and the total distance that patients were able to walk after 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours was measured.</p> <p><bold><italic>RESULTS</italic></bold><italic>:</italic> For the level of pain at rest and during movement, no significant differences at all time intervals were observed for both groups (<italic>p</italic> &gt;0.05). No additional prescription of narcotic analgesics was required. Compared with group 1, group 2 covered a significantly greater distance in the first 24 after the operation. After 48 hours, no significant differences were found between the two groups (<italic>p</italic> &gt;0.05).</p> <p><bold><italic>CONCLUSIONS</italic></bold><italic>:</italic> Femoral nerve and adductor canal blockades provide an adequate level of analgesia after knee arthroplasty. In particular, adductor canal blockade significantly increase the distance of movement by patients in the first 24 hours after surgery.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold><italic>Введение</italic></bold><italic>.</italic> Количество оперативных вмешательств на коленном суставе увеличивается каждый год. Это связано как с увеличением общего количества пациентов, так и с совершенствованием техники выполнения операции. Безусловно, положительный исход лечения пациента связан с оказанием современной анестезиолого-реанимационной помощи, в основе которой лежит адекватное обезболивание в периоперационном периоде, профилактика осложнений и как результат сокращение пребывания пациента в стационаре. Регионарная анальгезия – это современный и эффективным метод обезболивания после операции на коленном суставе. Однако место выполнения периферической блокады может оказывать влияние на сроки начала активизации и реабилитации у данной категории пациентов.</p> <p><bold><italic>Цель</italic></bold><italic>. </italic>Оценка применения блокады бедренного нерва и приводящего канала в рамках программы ускоренного восстановления после эндопротезирования коленного сустава.</p> <p><bold><italic>Материалы и методы</italic></bold><italic>.</italic> В проспективное рандомизированное одноцентровое исследование было включено 80 пациентов, которым выполняли первичное эндопротезирование коленного сустава. Пациенты случайным способом были рандомизированы на 2 клинические группы. В 1-ю группу (<italic>n</italic>=40) вошли пациенты, которым в послеоперационном периоде выполняли блокаду бедренного нерва. Во 2-ю группу (<italic>n</italic>=40) вошли пациенты, которым в послеоперационном периоде выполняли блокаду приводящего канала. В послеоперационном периоде осуществляли анализ уровня боли в покое и при движении, используя визуальную аналоговую шкалу уровня боли, через 6–12–24–48 ч, регистрировали количество назначаемого наркотического анальгетика в послеоперационном периоде, оценивали общее расстояние, которое пациенты смогли пройти через 6–12–24–48 ч.</p> <p><bold><italic>Результаты</italic></bold><italic>.</italic> При оценке уровня боли в покое и при движении в исследуемых группах не отмечено достоверных различий во всех временных промежутках исследования (<italic>p </italic>&gt;0,05). Дополнительного назначения наркотических анальгетиков не потребовалось. У пациентов 2-й группы отмечалось достоверно большее расстояние, пройдённое ими в первые 24 ч после операции. Через 48 ч достоверных различий между пациентами 1-й и 2-й групп не выявлено (<italic>p</italic> &gt;0,05).</p> <p><bold><italic>Выводы</italic></bold><italic>.</italic> Использование блокады бедренного нерва и приводящего канала обеспечивает адекватный уровень анальгезии после эндопротезирования коленного сустава. Блокада приводящего канала позволяет достоверно увеличить расстояние передвижения пациентами в первые 24 ч после операции.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>regional anesthesia</kwd><kwd>knee joint</kwd><kwd>femoral nerve block</kwd><kwd>adductor canal block</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>регионарная анестезия</kwd><kwd>коленный сустав</kwd><kwd>блокада бедренного нерва</kwd><kwd>блокада приводящего канала</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ovechkin AM. Postoperative pain: the state of problem and current trends in postoperative analgesia. Regional anesthesia and acute pain management. 2015;9(2):29–39. (In Russ).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Овечкин А.М. Послеоперационная боль: состояние проблемы и современные тенденции послеоперационного обезболивания // Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. 2015. Т. 9, № 2. С. 29–39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ovechkin AM. Chronic postoperative pain syndrome – «a pitfall» of modern surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2016;10(1):5–18. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/19936508-2016-10-1-5-18</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Овечкин А.М. Хронический послеоперационный болевой синдром – подводный камень современной хирургии // Регионарная анестезия и лечение острой боли. 2016. Т. 10, № 1. С. 5–18. 10.18821/19936508-2016-10-1-5-18</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pasechnik IN, Skobelev EI, Lipin IE. Fast-Track program in surgery: the role of postoperative anesthesia. Doctor.Ru. 2015;(15):49–53. (In Russ).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пасечник И.Н. Программа Fast-Track в хирургии: роль послеоперационного обезболивания // Доктор.Ру. 2015. № 15. С. 49–53.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jaeger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(6):526–532. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jaeger P., Zaric D., Fomsgaard J.S., et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study // Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 526–532. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davis JJ, Bond TS, Swenson JD. Adductor canal block: more than just the saphenous nerve? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34(6):618–619. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181bfbf00</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davis J.J., Bond T.S., Swenson J.D. Adductor canal block: more than just the saphenous nerve? // Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009. Vol. 34, N 6. P. 618–619. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181bfbf00</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">van der Wal M, Lang SA, Yip RW. Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 1993;40(6):542–546. doi: 10.1007/BF03009739</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van der Wal M., Lang S.A., Yip R.W. Transsartorial approach for saphenous nerve block // Can J Anaesth. 1993. Vol. 40, N 6. P. 542–546. doi: 10.1007/BF03009739</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim DH, Lin Y, Goytizolo EA, et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(3):540–550. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000119</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim D.H., Lin Y., Goytizolo E.A., et al. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial // Anesthesiology. 2014. Vol. 120, N 3. P. 540–550. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000119</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, et al. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013;38(4):321–325. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kwofie M.K., Shastri U.D., Gadsden J.C., et al. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers // Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013. Vol. 38, N 4. P. 321–325. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Labraca NS, Castro-Sanchez AM, Mataran-Penarrocha GA, et al. Benefits of starting rehabilitation within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroplasty: randomized clinical trial. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(6):557–566. doi: 10.1177/0269215510393759</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Labraca N.S., Castro-Sanchez A.M., Mataran-Penarrocha G.A., et al. Benefits of starting rehabilitation within 24 hours of primary total knee arthroplasty: randomized clinical trial // Clin Rehabil. 2011. Vol. 25, N 6. P. 557–566. doi: 10.1177/0269215510393759</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chandrasekaran S, Ariaretnam SK, Tsung J, Dickison D. Early mobilization after total knee replacement reduces the incidence of deep venous thrombosis. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79(7–8):526–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04982.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chandrasekaran S., Ariaretnam S.K., Tsung J., Dickison D. Early mobilization after total knee replacement reduces the incidence of deep venous thrombosis // ANZ J Surg. 2009. Vol. 79, N 7–8. P. 526–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.04982.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mudumbai SC, Kim TE, Howard SK, et al. Continuous adductor canal blocks are superior to continuous femoral nerve blocks in promoting early ambulation after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1377–1383. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3197-y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mudumbai S.C., Kim T.E., Howard S.K., et al. Continuous adductor canal blocks are superior to continuous femoral nerve blocks in promoting early ambulation after TKA // Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. Vol. 472, N 5. P. 1377–1383. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3197-y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shah NA, Jain NP. Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2224–2229. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.010</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shah N.A., Jain N.P. Is continuous adductor canal block better than continuous femoral nerve block after total knee arthroplasty? Effect on ambulation ability, early functional recovery and pain control: a randomized controlled trial // J Arthroplasty. 2014. Vol. 29, N 11. P. 2224–2229. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.010</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Seo SS, Kim OG, Seo JH, et al. Comparison of the Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9(3):303–309. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.303</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Seo S.S., Kim O.G., Seo J.H., et al. Comparison of the Effect of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block and Adductor Canal Block after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty // Clin Orthop Surg. 2017. Vol. 9, N 3. P. 303–309. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.303</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li D, Ma GG. Analgesic efficacy and quadriceps strength of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(8):2614–2619. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3874-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li D., Ma G.G. Analgesic efficacy and quadriceps strength of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block following total knee arthroplasty // Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016. Vol. 24, N 8. P. 2614–2619. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3874-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
